Tri mumpuni implementation

10
IBEKA
  • date post

    20-Oct-2014
  • Category

    Technology

  • view

    506
  • download

    9

description

 

Transcript of Tri mumpuni implementation

Page 1: Tri mumpuni implementation

IBEKA

Page 2: Tri mumpuni implementation

Kalimantan

Timur

Jawa Barat

Nanggroe

Aceh

Darusalam

Nusa

Tenggara

Timur Papua, Komoro tribes

Page 3: Tri mumpuni implementation

IBEKA

5300 km

1700 km

> 17.508 islands

+/- 7000 inhabited

+/- 243 million population

> 100 million unelectrified

> 30.000 unelectrified villages (remote, scattered and poor infrastructure)

Page 4: Tri mumpuni implementation
Page 5: Tri mumpuni implementation
Page 6: Tri mumpuni implementation

Village A

Village C (Taba)

Village B Village D

Village E Village F

= big power company = small (village/rural) power enterprise

Community based electric power system

IBEKA

PURPLE village, electrified (grid extension)

BLUE village, electrified (isolated grid)

RED village, unelectrified

500 kV grid

Concentrate for industries

and urban area

Page 7: Tri mumpuni implementation

Social business in electric power system

= big power company = small (village/rural) power enterprise

Concentrate for industries

and urban area

Village B

Village A Village F Village E

Village D

IBEKA

PURPLE village, electrified (grid extension)

BLUE village, electrified (isolated grid)

RED village, unelectrified

Village coop (Cinta Mekar)

all villages are electrified or grid connected

500 kV grid

Village C (Taba)

Page 8: Tri mumpuni implementation

IBEKA

community

empower -

ment

participatory

development

local

community

respect

Community

Based Development or

Social Business

PARADIGM AND BASIC PRINCIPLES for COMMUNITY BASED DEVELOPMENT / SOCIAL BUSINESS MODEL

SELF PROPELLING

&

INTRINSIC

EMPOWER-

MENT

INITIATIVE for

Page 9: Tri mumpuni implementation

village water

resource

potential

utilization

fossil fuel con-

sumption reduc-

tion per year

(million liters)

projected

investment

needed

(million USD)

projected

employee needed

[rural SME needed]

total capital

flow to village

SME per year

(million USD)

CER

carbon equiv

(total carbon

sales, USD)

10 MW

18.98

20 > 750 employee

[120 village SME]

2.814 17.082 ton

(120.000)

50 MW

94.90

100 > 4.500 employee

[575 village SME]

14.070 85.410 ton

(600.000)

100 MW

189.80

200 > 8.000 employee

[1.100 village SME]

28.140 170.820 ton

(1.200.000)

500 MW

949

1.000

> 39.000 employee

[5.250 village SME]

140.700

854.100 ton

(6.000.000)

utilization of village water resources for village

empowerment using community based development

and social business investment model.

Assumption :

1 litter of fossil fuel (diesel oil) will be used to generate 3 kWh of electric power.

Average investment cost of one village MHP unit is 200.000 USD. Capacity of the MHP is on average 100 KW per unit, operated by a village SME employed 7 local personnel.

Average monthly income each village MHP unit is $ 2345 USD, based on plant factor 0.65 and selling tariff 5.49 cent USD/KWh. Average yearly income each village MHP is $ 28.140

Certified Emission Reduction (CER), 1 liter HSD (diesel oil) equivalent to 0,9 kg CO2, carbon selling price is 7 USD/ton.

IBEKA

Page 10: Tri mumpuni implementation

increase

high morality numbers

to achieve critical mass

of wise personnel

in the society

increase

middle class numbers

to achieve high

capability work force

in the society

IBEKA

HUMAN LIVING PARADIGM CONTRAST

GROWTH BASED ECONOMY

(commercial business paradigm)

(social business paradigm)

HUMANITY BASED ECOLOGY

people, being persuaded

to spend money we don’t have

on things we don’t need

to create impression that won’t last

on people we don’t care about

people, are wise, social and nature conscious

consuming only what we need

humble and simple, caring and sharing

a mutual prosperity and peaceful living