Regional Change Analysis based on Medium …...Ke maman Harbor Kuantan New Port Strongest Epicenter...
1
! ! ! ! ! Badulla Anuradhapura Pegu Chachoengsao Narathiwat Kemaman Harbor Kuantan New Port Strongest Epicenter Date: 26/12/2004 Time: 00:58:53 UTC Location:3.26N 95.82E Magnitude:8.9 Sri Lanka Cuddalore Nagappattinam Guntur Meulaboh Jakarta Medan Serang Mana Padang Makasar Bandung Surabaja Semarang Bengkulu Gorontalo Palembang Pakanbaru Banda Aceh Pangkalpinang Colombo Bangkok Rangoon Singapore Phnom Penh Kuala Lumpur Ipoh Yala Trat Galle Satun Kandy Trang Krabi Tavoy Pa-an Pinang Melaka Kangar Phuket Ranong Kampot Rayong Madras Sittwe Barisal Pattani Bassein Seremban Songkhla Puttalan Phangnga Rach Gia Chumphon Moulmein Shah Alam Ratnapura Phet Buri Chon Buri Alor Setar Trivandrum Port Blair Ratchaburi Chittagong Kuala Lipis Kota Baharu Phatthalung Trincomalee Surat Thani Pondicherry Chanthaburi Johor Baharu Bhubaneshwar Vishakhapatnam Krong Kaoh Kong Samut Songkhram Kuala Terengganu Nakhon Si Thammarat Prachuap Khiri Khan Yunnan Hunan Bihar an Shan Guangxi Madhya Pradesh Maharashtra Jiangxi Uttar Pradesh Orissa Guizhou Fujian Northern Karnataka Andhra Pradesh Riau Guangdong Sarawak Central Kachin Northeastern Sagaing Assam Tamil Nadu Sabah Aceh Chin Kalimantan Tengah Jambi Southern West Bengal Magwe Kerala Haryana Taiwan Sumatera Selatan Arunachal Pradesh Sumatera Utara Jawa Barat Mandalay Lampung Irrawaddy Tenasserim Bago (Pegu) Manipur Mizoram Jawa Tengah Meghalaya Bengkulu Sumatera Barat Arakan (Rakhine) Kayah Nagaland Kalimantan Selatan Tripura Mon Mon Yen Bai Goa Sumatera Selatan Delhi Sumatera Utara Sumatera Barat Chukha Muara/Seria/Tutong Andaman & Nicobar Temburong Kalimantan Selatan New Territories Andaman & Nicobar Andaman & Nicobar Macau 72°0'0"E 72°0'0"E 78°0'0"E 78°0'0"E 84°0'0"E 84°0'0"E 90°0'0"E 90°0'0"E 96°0'0"E 96°0'0"E 102°0'0"E 102°0'0"E 108°0'0"E 108°0'0"E 114°0'0"E 114°0'0"E 120°0'0"E 120°0'0"E 6°0'0"S 6°0'0"S 0°0'0" 0°0'0" 6°0'0"N 6°0'0"N 12°0'0"N 12°0'0"N 18°0'0"N 18°0'0"N 24°0'0"N 24°0'0"N Regional Change Analysis based on Medium Resolution Satellite data . India Malaysia Myanmar Malaysia Thailand 1 cm equals 176 km Earthquake epicenters data from USGS as 03 Jan 2005 9:47:18 UTC Disclaimer: this map does not reflect the official opinion of the European Communities or other European Community institutions. Neither the European Commission nor any person or company acting on the behalf of the European Commission is responsible for the use that may be made of the information contained in this map. Indonesia Bangladesh Cambodia Laos Vietnam China Maldives Legend \ National Capital ! . Main coastal cities ! O Eartquake epicenters Provinces No interpretation due to cloud cover Potential high Tsunami affected area Potential low Tsunami affected area Affected Countries in orange India Somalia Kenya Tanzania Indonesia Thailand My anmar Bangladesh Maldiv es 2500 km from Main Epicenter ! . ! Madras ! Meulaboh Aceh (Indonesia) Cuddalore (India) Estimated surface based on Regional Change Analysis Potential High Effect Potential Low Effect Clouds coverage Bangladesh 84 728 693 India 1,734 912 2,486 Indonesia 1,138 3,366 3,858 Maldives 7 Myanmar 598 12,481 99 Sri Lanka 445 434 3,966 Thailand 731 1,135 219 Total 4,729 19,056 11,328 Sumatra 29/12/2005 Change Analysis based on MODIS 22 and 26 December 2004 Phuket (Thailand) Regional change analysis based on SPOT VEGETATION 7 daily SPOT VEGETATION images were used to compute the NDVI (Normalized Vegetation Difference Index) difference before and after the Tsunami event. The assumption behind this analysis is that abrupt NDVI reductions in cloud free areas are normally due to a decrease in vegetation cover or to the presence of water, and can therefore be used as indicators of the potential impact of the Tsunami. To reduce effect of cloud cover, maximum value composites were calculated for the 3 dates before (23, 24, 25) and for the 4 days (26, 27, 28, 29) after the event and heavily cloud covered areas were excluded completely. All pixels showing a negative difference were grouped into two classes: “high tsunami impact” if the difference is bigger than 0.1 NDVI and “low tsunami impact” if it’s between 0 and 0.1. Only pixels included in a buffer area defined by less than 5km distance from the coast line and less than 20 m altitude are shown in the map. Visible impact lies within the 2 lines shown in yellow and red
Transcript of Regional Change Analysis based on Medium …...Ke maman Harbor Kuantan New Port Strongest Epicenter...
!
!
!
!
!
Badulla
Anuradhapura
Pegu
Chachoengsao
Narathiwat
Kemaman HarborKuantan New Port
Strongest EpicenterDate: 26/12/2004Time: 00:58:53 UTCLocation:3.26N 95.82EMagnitude:8.9
Sri Lanka
Cuddalore
Nagappattinam
Guntur
Meulaboh
Jakarta
Palu
Medan
Serang
Manado
Padang
KendariMakasar
Bandung SurabajaSemarang
Bengkulu
Samarinda
GorontaloPontianak
Palembang
Pakanbaru
Banda Aceh
BalikpapanPangkalpinang
Colombo
Bangkok
Rangoon
Singapore
Phnom Penh
Kuala Lumpur
Ipoh
Yala
Trat
Galle
Satun
Kandy TrangKrabi
Tavoy
Pa-an
Pinang
Melaka
Kangar
Phuket
RanongKampot
RayongMadras
Sittwe
Barisal
Pattani
Bassein
Seremban
SongkhlaPuttalan
Phangnga
Rach Gia
Chumphon
Moulmein
Shah Alam
Ratnapura
Phet BuriChon Buri
Alor Setar
Trivandrum
Port Blair
Ratchaburi
Chittagong
Kuala Lipis
Kota Baharu
Phatthalung
TrincomaleeSurat Thani
PondicherryChanthaburi
Johor Baharu
Bhubaneshwar
Vishakhapatnam
Krong Kaoh Kong
Samut Songkhram
Kuala Terengganu
Nakhon Si Thammarat
Prachuap Khiri Khan
Yunnan
RajasthanHunan
Sind
Bihar
Baluchistan
Shan
GuangxiMadhya PradeshGujarat
Maharashtra
JiangxiUttar Pradesh
Orissa
GuizhouFujian
Northern
Karnataka
Andhra Pradesh
Riau
Guangdong
Sarawak
Central
Kachin
Northeastern
Zhejiang
Sagaing
Assam
Tamil Nadu
SabahAceh
Chin
Kalimantan TengahJambi
Kalimantan Timur
Southern
West Bengal
Magwe
Kerala
Haryana
Taiwan
Sumatera Selatan
Arunachal Pradesh
Sumatera Utara
Jawa Barat
Mandalay
Lampung
Irrawaddy
Tenasserim
Bago (Pegu)
Manipur
Mizoram
Jawa Tengah
Meghalaya
Bengkulu
SumateraBarat
Arakan (Rakhine) Kayah
Nagaland
Sulawesi Utara
Kalimantan Selatan
Tripura
Mon
Mon
Yen Bai
Goa
Sumatera Selatan
Delhi
Sumatera Utara
Sumatera Barat
Chukha
Muara/Seria/Tutong
Andaman & Nicobar
Temburong
Kalimantan Selatan
New Territories
Andaman & Nicobar
Daman and Diu
Andaman & Nicobar
Daman and Diu
Macau
72°0'0"E
72°0'0"E
78°0'0"E
78°0'0"E
84°0'0"E
84°0'0"E
90°0'0"E
90°0'0"E
96°0'0"E
96°0'0"E
102°0'0"E
102°0'0"E
108°0'0"E
108°0'0"E
114°0'0"E
114°0'0"E
120°0'0"E
120°0'0"E
6°0'0"S 6°0'0"S
0°0'0" 0°0'0"
6°0'0"N 6°0'0"N
12°0'0"N 12°0'0"N
18°0'0"N 18°0'0"N
24°0'0"N 24°0'0"N
Regional Change Analysis based on Medium Resolution Satellite data
.
India
Malaysia
Myanmar
Malaysia
Thailand
1 cm equals 176 kmEarthquake epicenters data from USGS as 03 Jan 2005 9:47:18 UTCDisclaimer: this map does not reflect the official opinion of the European Communitiesor other European Community institutions. Neither the European Commission nor any person or company acting on the behalf of the European Commission is responsiblefor the use that may be made of the information contained in this map.
Indonesia
Bangladesh
Cambodia
Laos
Vietnam
China
Maldives
Legend\ National Capital!. Main coastal cities!O Eartquake epicenters
ProvincesNo interpretation due to cloud coverPotential high Tsunami affected areaPotential low Tsunami affected area
Affected Countries in orange
India
SomaliaKenya
Tanzania Indonesia
ThailandMyanmar
Bangladesh
Maldives
2500 km from Main Epicenter
!.! Madras
!Meulaboh
Aceh (Indonesia)
Cuddalore (India)
Estimated surface based onRegional Change Analysis
Potential High Effect
Potential Low Effect
Clouds coverage
Bangladesh 84 728 693India 1,734 912 2,486Indonesia 1,138 3,366 3,858Maldives 7Myanmar 598 12,481 99Sri Lanka 445 434 3,966Thailand 731 1,135 219Total 4,729 19,056 11,328
Sumatra 15/12/2005 Sumatra 29/12/2005
Change Analysis based on MODIS 22 and 26 December 2004Phuket (Thailand)
Regional change analysis based on SPOT VEGETATION7 daily SPOT VEGETATION images were used to compute the NDVI (Normalized VegetationDifference Index) difference before and after the Tsunami event. The assumption behind thisanalysis is that abrupt NDVI reductions in cloud free areas are normally due to a decreasein vegetation cover or to the presence of water, and can therefore be used as indicators of thepotential impact of the Tsunami.To reduce effect of cloud cover, maximum value composites were calculated for the 3 datesbefore (23, 24, 25) and for the 4 days (26, 27, 28, 29) after the event and heavily cloud coveredareas were excluded completely. All pixels showing a negative difference were grouped intotwo classes: “high tsunami impact” if the difference is bigger than 0.1 NDVI and “low tsunamiimpact” if it’s between 0 and 0.1. Only pixels included in a buffer area defined by less than5km distance from the coast line and less than 20 m altitude are shown in the map.
Visible impact lies within the 2 lines shown in yellow and red
