PROBLEMS OF THE CONSTRUCTION PRIORITY OF URBAN … · PARIS TOKYO & “Roads and Public...
Transcript of PROBLEMS OF THE CONSTRUCTION PRIORITY OF URBAN … · PARIS TOKYO & “Roads and Public...
PROBLEMS OF THE CONSTRUCTION PRIORITY OF URBAN RAILWAY NETWORK PROJECT : JAKARTA
JTTRI SeminarJakarta, 14 February 2020
OUTLINE
• DKI Jakarta Mobility Condition
• Motorization Scenarios
• Public Mass Transportation System Network in DKI Jakarta Existing Condition
• Public Mass Transportation System Network Indications for DKI Jakarta 2030
• Public Transportation System Implementation Hierarchy
LIVING PLACE
• Feeder
Services
• Pedestrian
Facilities
• Bicycle Paths
• Park and Ride
• Taxi Stand
USE OF PRIVATE VEHICLE
ACTIVITY PLACE
• Feeder Services
• Pedestrian
Facilities
• Bicycle Paths
• Transfer
Facilities
• Park and
Ride
• Taxi Stand
CHEAPER AND FASTER
USE OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION
P O L I C Y D I R E C T I O NACCESSIBILITY-ORIENTED TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT
M O T O R I Z AT I O NMOTORIZATION GROWTH IS NOT PARALLEL WITH THE PROVISION OF
PUBLIC TRANSPORT
Proportion of Private Vehicle and Public Transportation Users
Motorization will continue to increase without
network development
(“Do-Nothing Scenario”)
Congestion continues to increase with motorization and urbanization. District utilization
change and economy growth also increases the movement needs that need to be facilitated by
public transportation.
2010 2019 2025 2030 2040 2050
Public Mode 27% 20% 22% 26% 30% 40%
Private Mode 73% 80% 78% 74% 70% 60%
Capital Split Trend and Scenarios 2010 – 2050
(Do Something)
Congestion around
Ragunan occurs with the
nearby TB Simatupang
business area which has a
large generation and
attraction.
STRATEGY FOR
IMPROVING PUBLIC
TRANSPORT ION
MARKET SHARE
Network Development and Transportation
Policy will reduce motorization
(“Do-Something Scenario”)
DKI JAKARTA MOBILITY CONDITIONS
Congestion and Lack of Public Transportation Quality in Jabodetabek
External impacts such as wasted time, air pollution and the declining of public health
High Motorization Rate
• The increase of Road Ratio from 15% -20%
• Massive Road Development - High
Infrastructure Investment -
• Inefficient Transportation System
• Road Capacity vs. Traffic Volume
• The increase of Air Pollution
Low Motorization Rate
• To manage the growth in the use of Private Vehicles
• Development Priorities of the Mass Public Transportation System
• Big investment - exploratory of KPBU(PPP) project
• More efficient Transportation System
• Better Environtment
MOTORIZATION SCENARIO
T O K Y OPA R I S
&
“Roads and Public Transportations
Play Important Roles in Urban
Mobility ”
The Road Ratio and Public
Transportation Ratio in Jakarta
are still low compared to other
cities in the world
• The condition of mass public transportation in
DKI Jakarta is still not well developed.
• Based on the Macro Transportation Pattern
(PTM) recommends four modes of public
transportation that are needed to overcome
the transportation problems comprehensively.
• In line with the development of existing
modes, it is also necessary to take steps to
limit the use of private vehicles by restricting
the traffic.
• Scenarios’ development with the priority of
developing public transportation systems with
various alternatives, including scenarios for
implementing Transport Demand
Management.
PUBLIC MASS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IN DKI JAKARTAExisting Condition
PUBLIC MASS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM NETWORK INDICATIONS IN DKI JAKARTA 2030
• MRT I Lebak Bulus-Bundaran HI (2019)
• LRT Jakarta (2020)
• LRT Jabodebek (2022)
• LRT Jakarta Velodrom-Manggarai (2022)
• MRT Phase II Bundaran HI - Kota (2024)
• Jakarta Loopline (2024)
• MRT East-West (2028)
Constraints and obstacles to pursue
infrastructure development targets
• The great need for funding/financing,
inadequate government fiscal
• Limited number of competent human
resources
• High demand for construction material and
equipment sources
• Supporting policies that is still need to be
formulated
• Institutional and regulatory support
DKI JAKARTA PROVINCE LOCAL GOVERNMENT
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION HIERARCHY
THE PURPOSE OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
• Efficiency to support economic growth
• Justice/equality in community mobility, including:
• promoting the use of public transportation
• reduction of traffic jams rate.
PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
• Transportation System Flexibility
• Ease of Developing Transportation Systems
• Inter-modes Integration
• Integration of Transportation Systems and Land Use
• Long-term Development Consistency
• Consistency between areas/regions in JABODETABEK
JABODETABEK RAILWAY SYSTEM▪ Tangerang Line▪ Serpong Line▪ Bogor –Depok Central Line▪ Bekasi Line▪ Loop Line▪ Tanjung Priok Line
MASS TRANSIT SYSTEM BACKBONE (JAKARTA)▪ Transjakarta Busway
(15 coridors)▪ MRT Lebak Bulus-Kota▪ MRT East-West▪ Proposed New LRT Lines
FEEDER SYSTEM & RESTRUCTURED REGULER BUS SYSTEM
NON MOTORIZED TRANSPORT :▪ Pedestrian▪ BicycleTaxiParatransit
FUNDING OPTION FOR INFRASTRUCTURE
PARTNERSHIP COMPETITIVE EFFECTIVE
BENEFITS RISKS CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT
EFFICIENT
KPBU/PPP PRINCIPLES
Cooperation between the Government and
Business Entities (KPBU/PPP) in the provision
of infrastructure for public interest refers to the
specifications that have been predetermined by
the Person in Charge of the Cooperation
Project (PJPK), which partially or completely
uses the resources of the business entity by
having regard to the risk management between
the parties.
KEY OF UNDERSTANDING
COOPERATION RISK MANAGEMENT
PREDETERMINED SPECIFICATION
PUBLIC INTEREST
PARTIAL OR COMPLETE
BUSINESS ENTITY’S RESOURCES
19 TYPES OF KBPU (PPP) INFRASTRUCTURE SECTORS
9
Airports
Ports
Railway
Land and
Crossing
Roads
Highway
Highway Bridge
Traditional Market
Transportation Roads
Urban Facilities
Local Waste Management
Drinking Water
Community/Residents Housing
Waste/Garbage Management
Centralized Waste Management
Natural Resources & Irrigation
Area/Park
Education FacilitiesCorrectional Institution
HealthSports, Arts and Culture Facilities
Tourism
Power Plants
Transmission
Public Street
Lighting
Electricity Energy ConservationOil and Gas & Renewable Energy
Telecommunication &Informatics
Fiber Optic
e-Gov
CONNECTIVITY
URBAN FACILITIES SOCIAL FACILITIES
INVESTMENT RETURN PATTERN
10
Tarif
USER FEE AVAILABILITY PAYMENT
Definition
● Periodic payment by the Minister/Institutional Head/Regional Head to theImplementing Business Entity on the availability of infrastructure services that are inaccordance with the quality and/or criteria as specified in the KBPU/PPP Agreement
KPBU/PPP Agreement
Contractor Operator
Business Entity
Business Entity
KPBU/PPP Agreement
Contractor Operator
User
User
Credit AgreementCredit
Agreement
APBN/APBD Allocation
KPBU/PPP SCHEME WITH RETURNS FROM AVAILABILITY PAYMENT (AP)AP Payment Towards Service Standards (SLA)
11
Public Expenditures in AP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28
Total Expenditures
280
Rp
Year
No Construction Payment
Risks transferred to private
sector and regulated by private sector.
Availability Payment (AP)
Public Expenditures in Conventional Schemes
Construction Payment
Operation &
Maintenance PaymentUnexpected risks / costs borne
by the public
Total Expenditures
290
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
40
100 100 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Rp
Year
40
40
Sumber: LKPP
Minimum Service Standards for the availability of:1. Rail-based Mass Transportation Capacity2.Headway, Waiting time and Travel time according to the
operating plan
• Sustainability: Planning-construction-operation-maintenance stages
• On schedule, on budget, on service
The Benefits of AP :
SLA
Minimum Standards
Regulated
SLA
Business Entity
Actual
Penalty
Full AP Full AP – Penalty
Payment towards SLA: