Kebijakan Riset Dalam Mendukung Publikasi Ilmiah InternationalBereputasi

Ocky Karna Radjasa

Kemenristek Dikti

Direktorat Riset dan Pengabdian MasyarakatDirektorat Jenderal Penguatan Riset dan Pengembangan

Ditjen Penguatan Riset danPengembangan

Direktorat Sistem Risetdan Pengembangan

SubdirektoratPengembangan Sistem

Riset dan PengembanganSubdirektorat

Harmonisasi Program danEvaluasi Sistem Riset dan

PengembanganSubdirektorat Kemitraan

Strategis Riset danPengembangan

Subdirektorat SistemInformasi Riset dan

Pengembangan

Direktorat Riset danPengabdian Masyarakat

Subdirektorat Riset Dasar

Subdirektorat RisetTerapan

SubdirektoratPemberdayaan

Masyarakat

SubdirektoratPeningkatan Kapasitas

Riset

DirektoratPengembangan

Teknologi Industri

Subdirektorat PengembanganTeknologi Industri Informasi

Komunikasi dan Pertahanan danKeamanan

Subdirektorat PengembanganTeknologi Industri Energi dan

Transportasi

Subdirektorat PengembanganTeknologi Industri Pangan,

Kesehatan dan Obat

Subdirektorat PengembanganTeknologi Industri Bahan Baku

dan Material Maju

Direktorat PengelolaanKekayaan Intelektual

Subdirektorat Valuasidan Fasilitasi Kekayaan

Intelektual

Subdirektorat FasilitasiJurnal Ilmiah

Subdirektorat FasilitasiPublikasi Ilmiah

Subdirektorat PerijinanPenelitian

Setditjen

Bagian Perencanaandan Penganggaran

Bagian Hukum, KerjaSama, dan Layanan

InformasiBagian Umum

Kelompok Jabatan Fungsional

PROSES BISNIS RISET KITATI

NGG

INYA

DAY

A SA

ING

BAN

GSA

INDO

NES

IA Publikasiglobal

Paten/ HakCipta

TransaksilisensiM

ANFA

AT B

AGI

MAS

YARA

KAT

HARU

SDI

KAW

AL RISET

HILIRISASI

INOVASI

INVENSI

KELUARAN

Tak Semua Hilirisasi

Paten / HakCipta

Indu

stri

Indu

stri

Lem

lit/

PT

Lem

lit/

PTIn

dust

ri

FOKUS: KELUARAN “AKHIR” RISETPENILAIAN: INDEPENDEN OLEH EKSTERNAL

INVENSI PADA TEKNOLOGI INTI, BUKAN PRODUK AKHIR

Rise

tDa

sar/

Fund

amen

tal

/Rise

tTer

apan

/Rise

tPe

ngem

bang

an

TECHNOLOGY READINESS LEVEL

TechnologyTechnology MarketMarket OrganizationOrganization PartnershipPartnership RiskRiskIRLIRL

Targetted outputs of Research in University

ResearchProductivity:

-No. papers publishedin international peer-reviewed journal-No . competitiveresearch grants- No. IPR

Research Impact:- No. citation- No. research based-teaching materials- No. research based-teaching books- Outreach

Research excellence:-No. highly cited papers- H-index- No. publication inhighly impact journals- No. CoE

Attractiveness and Competitiveness

Survival of UniversitySurvival of University

H-indexH-index

Impact factor vs H-indexImpact factor vs H-index The impact factor for a journal is calculated based on a three-year period, and can be

considered to be the average number of times published papers are cited up to twoyears after publication. For example, the impact factor 2009 for a journal would becalculated as follows:

A = the number of times articles published in 2007-8 were cited in indexed journals

B = the number of articlespublished in 2007-8

Impact Factor 2009 = A/B

Microbial EcologyImpact Factor: 2.558 (2007)Nature: 36,28; Nature Biotechnology: 23.268

Publikasi dalam sistem ranking PT DuniaPublikasi dalam sistem ranking PT Dunia

Academic Ranking ofWorld Universities

(ARWU)

QS World UniversityRankings

(QS-WUR)

Times Higher Educationof World University

Ranking (THE)

AcademicPeer Review,

40%

EmployerReview, 10%

StudentFaculty Ratio,

20%

Int'l Faculty,5%

Int'l Student,5%

Citations PerFaculty, 20%

Nobel/FieldsMedal

Alumni,10%

Nobel/FieldsMedal

Winner,20%

HiCiResearcher

, 20%

Nature/ScienceArticles,

20%

SCI/SSCI/A& HCIArticles,

20%

Per CapitaPerforman

ce 10%

Teaching &learning

environment,30%

Citations, PerPaper, 32.5%

Int'l Staff andStudent, 5%

ResearchIncome from

Industry, 2.5%

Researchvolume,

income andreputation,

30%

THE-QS World University Rankings

Academic Peer Review 40% Academics indicate which field they

specialise in and then list up to 30universities they regard as leaders in thisfield.

Composite score drawn from peerreview survey (which is divided into fivesubject areas). Results compiled based onthree years’ worth of responses totaling6,354 in 2008.

Safeguards against individuals voting fortheir own university strengthened.

Rise of Asian universities is leastapparent in this ranking.

International Staff 5% Score calculated based on the

proportion of Full Time Equivalent(FTE) faculty that are international.

Employer Review 10% Score based on responses to employer survey.

2,339 responses in 2008. Recruiter names are sourced through QS

databases, media partners and partner schools &universities.

Responses are weighted by region to reach a finalscore.

Staff/Student 20% Score based simply on the student faculty ratio,

the higher the number of faculty per studentthe higher the score.

Full- and part-time numbers for staff andstudents obtained; FTEs used throughout as faras possible.

Citation/Staff 20% Score based on research performancefactored against the size of the research

body . Five years of publication data with

citations from Scopus. Number of citations is divided by the

number of FTE staff to give anindication of the density of research.

International Student 5% Score calculated based on the

proportion of total students thatare international.

THE-QSRankings

Target dan Capaian Indikator Program Tahun 2016 (2)Program Penguatan Kelembagaan

No Indikator ProgramTarget

2015Capaian 2015

% Capaian

2015

Target

2016****)

1 Jumlah Perguruan Tinggi masuk top 500 dunia 2 2 100 3

2Jumlah Perguruan Tinggi berakreditasi A

(Unggul)29 25 86,27 39

3Jumlah Taman Sains dan Teknologi (TST)

yang dibangun77

57*)74,03 100***)

9**)

4Jumlah Taman Sains dan Teknologi yang

mature6 2 33,33 14

5 Pusat Unggulan Iptek 12 19 158,33 15*) Termasuk dengan Kementerian /Lembaga Lain**) Dibawah Kementerian Riset,Teknologi,dan Pendidikan Tinggi***) Termasuk dengan Kementerian /Lembaga Lain****) Renstra Kemenristekdikti 2015-2019

10

SUMBER DANA RISET LAIN PTNBH (24%), PT BLU 15%, PK SATKER (10%)+

http://www.doaj.org

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

16

29

45

108 113

185

0 0 0 2 3 6 917

42

55

70

80 7872

0 1 2 2 4 4 4 4 5 7 10

36 3630

0 0 0 1 1 15 6

10 1216 19 16 15

0 0 0 1 1 2 3 37

12 15 13 13 13

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 00

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

IndonesiaMalaysiaSingaporeThailandPhilippinesCambodiaBruneiVietnam

11 Oktober 2015

Jurnal Digital Di Asia

STANDAR NASIONALPENELITIAN

KINERJA PENELITIANPT

STANDAR HASIL

1

VS

STANDAR NASIONALPENGABDIAN

KINERJAPENGABDIAN PT

STANDAR HASIL

1

VS

Scopus-indexed publicationsScopus-indexed publications

• Research article• Review• Short Communication• Proceeding• Book/book chapter

INDONESIA HARUS JUARATAHUN 2020

RISET

PUBLIKASI & PATEN

Jurnal Indonesia TerindeksScopus

Country 2011 2015

Malaysia 46 79

Thailand 26 26

Philiphine 13 22

Indonesia 8 25

JUMLAH JURNAL TERAKREDITASI DAN PROGRAMPENINGKATAN JUMLAH JURNAL

JUMLAH JURNAL TERAKREDITASI DAN PROGRAMPENINGKATAN JUMLAH JURNAL

Jurnal 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

AkreditasiNasional 178 218 275 345 415

TerindeksInternasional 25 36 45 56 65

Jurnal 2014

Akreditasi Nasional(DIKTI) 158

Terindeks Internasional 25 BANTUAN TATA KELOLAJURNAL ELEKTRONIK

BANTUAN TATA KELOLAJURNAL ELEKTRONIK

BANTUAN TATA KELOLA JURNAL ELEKTRONIKBANTUAN TATA KELOLA JURNAL ELEKTRONIK

SOLUSI/INTERVERENSI TUJUAN INTERVERENSI

Workshop Pengembangan Jurnal Elektronik &Pengelolaannya

Meningkatkan kemampuan tata kelola jurnalelektronik

Pengembangan Indonesian Citation Index (ICI) Meningkatkan mutu dan jumlah jurnalterakreditasi/terindeks internasional

Pelatihan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Meningkatkan kemampuan dosen mempublikasi dijurnal nasional dan internasional

Hibah Internasionalisasi Jurnal Meningkatkan jumlah jurnal terindeks internasional

Hibah Jurnal Terindeks (Scopus, Thomson,DOAJ )

Meningkatkan jumlah jurnal terindeks internasional

Workshop Internasionalisasi Jurnal Meningkatkan jumlah jurnal terindeks internasional

Penyusunan Instrumen Akreditasi JurnalElektronik

Meningkatkan mutu dan jumlah jurnal terakreditasi

Insentif untuk publikasi internasional Meningkatkan jumlah publikasi dosen di jurnalinternasional

Langganan E-Journals Meningkatkan kualitas riset dan publikasi dosen

21

22

Scientific MisconductScientific Misconduct

– Fabrication is making up data or results and recording orreporting them.

– Falsification is manipulating research materials,equipment, or processes, or changing or omitting data orresults such that the research is not accuratelyrepresented in the research record.

– Plagiarism is the appropriation of another person’s ideas,processes, results, or words without giving appropriatecredit

Why does misconduct happen?Why does misconduct happen?

Publish or Perish Pressure Desire to “get ahead” Personal problems Grant or gone Cultural Differences

A. Gawrylewski (2009) The Scientist 23:67.

Who commits scientific misconduct?

Retracted Publications: The Hidden World ofBiomedical Literature

Merle Rosenzweig*, Anna Ercoli Schnitzer, Katy Mahraj, and Irina ZeylikovichUniversity of Michigan Taubman Health Sciences Library

Ricahrd Van Noorden, Nature (2011)summarizing

Wager & Williams. Journal Medical EthicsWhy and how do journals retract articles?An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008

Carl Zimmer, NYTimes (2012)summarizing

Steen. Journal of Medical EthicsRetractions in the scientific literature: is the

incidence of research fraud increasing

Retractions on the rise, But is misconduct also on the rise?Retractions on the rise, But is misconduct also on the rise?

Results: Average of Months to Retraction

Terima Kasih atas perhatiannya

MINISTRY OF RESEARCH,TECHNOLOGY AND HIGHER

EDUCATION 28