KUESIONERrepository.sari-mutiara.ac.id/188/3/APPENDIX.pdf · kuesioner faktor-faktor yang...

KUESIONER

FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG BERHUBUNGAN DENGAN STATUS GIZIBALITA DI PUSKESMAS RAWAT INAP SIMUNDOL 2016

I. Identitas Respondon1. Nama :2. Umur :3. Pekerjaan :4. Paritas :

II. Identitas Balita1. Nama :2. Umur :3. Berat Badan :4. Tinggi Badan :5. Jenis Kelamin :

III. Sosial EkonomiBerapakah pendapat keluarga dalam setiap bulannya?a. <1.800.000 b. >1.800.000

IV. Pemberian Asi EksklusifApakah balita anda telah mendapatkan asi eksklusif pada usia 0-6 bulan ?a. Ya b. Tidak

V. Kelengkapan ImunisasiApakah balita anda telah mendapat imunisasi lengkap (Hepatitis, BCG,DPT, Polio) pada usia 0-12 bulan ?a. Ya b. Tidak

VI. Penyakit PenyertaApakah dalam satu bulan terakhir ini balita anda pernah menderitapenyakit Infeksi?a. Ya b. Tidak

UNIVERSITAS SARI MUTIARA INDONESIA

VII. Pengetahuan IbuNo Pertanyaan Ya Tidak1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

Balita adalah anak yang telah menginjak usia di atassatu tahun atau dalam artian khusus anak yang berusiadi bawah lima tahun.

Pertumbuhan ditunjukkan pada perubahan bentukkarena pertambahan sel dan intersel yang peneliannyayaitu dengan mengukur keadaan fisik. Perkembanganyaitu yang berhubungan dengan struktur dan fungsi,baik yang berhubungan secara langsung.

Zat gizi adalah bahan selain obat yang mengandungzat – zat gizi dan atau unsur/ikatan kimia yang dapatdiubah menjadi zat gizi oleh tubuh , yang berguna biladimasukkan ke dalam tubuh

Memberikan penjelasan mengenai keuntungan dankelemahan dari masing-masing metode yang adabukan merupakan penilaian status gizi.

Yang merupakan faktor internal, yang memepengaruhistatus gizi balita yaitu umur, jenis kelamin

Zat gizi yang diperlukan oleh anak balita adalah zatgizi yang mengandung karborhidrat dan protein saja

Balita yang mengalami marasmus memiliki ciri – ciriterdapat oedema pada tubuh

Balita yang mengalami kwashiokor adalah balita yangkekuranga karbohidrat

Balita yang obesitas adalah balita yang memiliki beratbadan yang berlebihan

Balita yang menderita penyakit infeksi sering terjadimangalami mal nutrisi sehingga status balita menjadibalita gizi buruk


Pola Makan (Food Frequency)

Bahan Makanan

Frekuensi

Lebih 1xsehari

1 xsehari

3-6 xsem

inggu

uu

1-2 xsem

inggu

Kurang 1 x

seminggu

Tidak

pernah

Karbohidrat (jagung,gandum, beras giling,kentang)Daging sapi/babi/kambingHatiIkan segarUdang segarAyamTelurSusu sapiKacang tanah, kedelai


ReliabilityScale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in theprocedure.

Reliability StatisticsCronbach's Alpha N of Items

.789 10

Correlations

Correlations

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 totalQ1 Pearson

Correlation 1 .408* .134 .740** .283 .218 .000 .336 .202 .336 .735**

Sig. (2-tailed) .025 .481 .000 .130 .247 1.000 .069 .285 .069 .000N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

Q2 PearsonCorrelation .408* 1 .218 .384* .144 .059 -.068 .110 .302 .027 .522**

Sig. (2-tailed) .025 .247 .036 .447 .755 .721 .563 .105 .885 .003N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

Q3 PearsonCorrelation .134 .218 1 .144 .236 .029 -.200 .279 -.009 -.009 .375*

Sig. (2-tailed) .481 .247 .448 .209 .878 .288 .136 .962 .962 .041N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

Q4 PearsonCorrelation .740** .384* .144 1 .238 .161 -.101 .186 .086 .629** .701**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .036 .448 .206 .394 .596 .326 .651 .000 .000N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

Q5 PearsonCorrelation .283 .144 .236 .238 1 .000 .000 .809** .476** .190 .674**

Sig. (2-tailed) .130 .447 .209 .206 1.000 1.000 .000 .008 .314 .000N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

Q6 PearsonCorrelation .218 .059 .029 .161 .000 1 .036 .308 -.161 -.015 .415*

Sig. (2-tailed) .247 .755 .878 .394 1.000 .849 .097 .394 .939 .030N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

Q7 PearsonCorrelation .000 -.068 -.200 -.101 .000 .036 1 -.101 .101 .101 .406*

Sig. (2-tailed) 1.000 .721 .288 .596 1.000 .849 .596 .596 .596 .033N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30


Q8 PearsonCorrelation .336 .110 .279 .186 .809** .308 -.101 1 .222 .086 .647**

Sig. (2-tailed) .069 .563 .136 .326 .000 .097 .596 .239 .651 .000N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

Q9 PearsonCorrelation .202 .302 -.009 .086 .476** -.161 .101 .222 1 .050 .452*

Sig. (2-tailed) .285 .105 .962 .651 .008 .394 .596 .239 .794 .012N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

Q10 PearsonCorrelation .336 .027 -.009 .629** .190 -.015 .101 .086 .050 1 .480**

Sig. (2-tailed) .069 .885 .962 .000 .314 .939 .596 .651 .794 .007N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

total PearsonCorrelation .735** .522** .375* .701** .674** .415* .406* .647** .452* .480** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .003 .041 .000 .000 .030 .033 .000 .012 .007N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).


Reliability

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %Cases Valid 30 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0Total 30 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in theprocedure.

Reliability StatisticsCronbach's Alpha N of Items

.728 5

Correlations

Correlations

Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 totalQ11 Pearson Correlation 1 .312 .144 .740** .591** .807**

Sig. (2-tailed) .094 .448 .000 .001 .000N 30 30 30 30 30 30

Q12 Pearson Correlation .312 1 .434* .346 .282 .683**

Sig. (2-tailed) .094 .016 .061 .131 .000N 30 30 30 30 30 30

Q13 Pearson Correlation .144 .434* 1 .134 .157 .542**

Sig. (2-tailed) .448 .016 .481 .407 .002N 30 30 30 30 30 30

Q14 Pearson Correlation .740** .346 .134 1 .346 .745**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .061 .481 .061 .000N 30 30 30 30 30 30

Q15 Pearson Correlation .591** .282 .157 .346 1 .683**

Sig. (2-tailed) .001 .131 .407 .061 .000N 30 30 30 30 30 30

total Pearson Correlation .807** .683** .542** .745** .683** 1Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .002 .000 .000N 30 30 30 30 30 30

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).


MASTER DATA


FrequenciesFrequency Table

umur bayi

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

PercentValid 1-2 tahun 29 40.8 40.8 40.8

3-5 tahun 42 59.2 59.2 100.0Total 71 100.0 100.0

jenis kelamin


PercentValid laki-laki 45 63.4 63.4 63.4

perempuan 26 36.6 36.6 100.0Total 71 100.0 100.0

pengetahuan ibu


PercentValid baik 29 40.8 40.8 40.8

kurang baik 42 59.2 59.2 100.0Total 71 100.0 100.0

sosial ekonomi


PercentValid >Rp.1.800.000 32 45.1 45.1 45.1

<Rp.1.800.000 39 54.9 54.9 100.0Total 71 100.0 100.0

pola pemberian makanan



kurang baik 40 56.3 56.3 100.0Total 71 100.0 100.0

kelengkapan imunisasi


PercentValid lengkap 62 87.3 87.3 87.3

tidak lengkap 9 12.7 12.7 100.0Total 71 100.0 100.0


penyakit penyerta


PercentValid tidak ada 37 52.1 52.1 52.1

ada 34 47.9 47.9 100.0Total 71 100.0 100.0

pemberian ASI


PercentValid diberikan 32 45.1 45.1 45.1

tidak diberikan 39 54.9 54.9 100.0Total 71 100.0 100.0

status gizi balita



kurang 33 46.5 46.5 100.0Total 71 100.0 100.0


Crosstabs

pengetahuan ibu * status gizi balita

Crosstabstatus gizi balita

Totalbaik kurangpengetahuan ibu baik Count 22 7 29

% within pengetahuan ibu 75.9% 24.1% 100.0%% of Total 31.0% 9.9% 40.8%

kurang baik Count 16 26 42% within pengetahuan ibu 38.1% 61.9% 100.0%% of Total 22.5% 36.6% 59.2%

Total Count 38 33 71% within pengetahuan ibu 53.5% 46.5% 100.0%% of Total 53.5% 46.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value dfAsymp. Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (2-


sided)Pearson Chi-Square 9.836a 1 .002Continuity Correctionb 8.377 1 .004Likelihood Ratio 10.200 1 .001Fisher's Exact Test .003 .002Linear-by-Linear Association 9.698 1 .002N of Valid Cases 71a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 13.48.b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value95% Confidence IntervalLower Upper

Odds Ratio for pengetahuan ibu(baik / kurang baik) 5.107 1.780 14.655

For cohort status gizi balita =baik 1.991 1.287 3.082

For cohort status gizi balita =kurang .390 .196 .775

N of Valid Cases 71


sosial ekonomi * status gizi balita


Totalbaik kurangsosial ekonomi >Rp.1.800.000 Count 21 11 32

% within sosial ekonomi 65.6% 34.4% 100.0%% of Total 29.6% 15.5% 45.1%

<Rp.1.800.000 Count 17 22 39% within sosial ekonomi 43.6% 56.4% 100.0%% of Total 23.9% 31.0% 54.9%

Total Count 38 33 71% within sosial ekonomi 53.5% 46.5% 100.0%% of Total 53.5% 46.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests




sided)Pearson Chi-Square 3.431a 1 .064Continuity Correctionb 2.602 1 .107Likelihood Ratio 3.468 1 .063Fisher's Exact Test .094 .053Linear-by-LinearAssociation 3.383 1 .066

N of Valid Cases 71a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.87.b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate


Odds Ratio for sosial ekonomi(>Rp.1.800.000 /<Rp.1.800.000)

2.471 .941 6.490

For cohort status gizi balita =baik 1.506 .973 2.329

For cohort status gizi balita =kurang .609 .351 1.059

N of Valid Cases 71


pola pemberian makanan * status gizi balita


Totalbaik kurangpola pemberian makanan baik Count 29 2 31

% within pola pemberianmakanan 93.5% 6.5% 100.0%

% of Total 40.8% 2.8% 43.7%kurang baik Count 9 31 40


% of Total 12.7% 43.7% 56.3%Total Count 38 33 71


% of Total 53.5% 46.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests




sided)Pearson Chi-Square 35.440a 1 .000Continuity Correctionb 32.641 1 .000Likelihood Ratio 40.590 1 .000Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000Linear-by-LinearAssociation 34.941 1 .000


Risk Estimate


Odds Ratio for pola pemberianmakanan (baik / kurang baik) 8.944 3.947 25.782



N of Valid Cases 71


kelengkapan imunisasi * status gizi balita


Totalbaik kurangkelengkapan imunisasi lengkap Count 34 28 62

% within kelengkapanimunisasi 54.8% 45.2% 100.0%

% of Total 47.9% 39.4% 87.3%tidak lengkap Count 4 5 9


% of Total 5.6% 7.0% 12.7%Total Count 38 33 71


% of Total 53.5% 46.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests




sided)Pearson Chi-Square .341a 1 .559Continuity Correctionb .051 1 .821Likelihood Ratio .340 1 .560Fisher's Exact Test .724 .409Linear-by-LinearAssociation .337 1 .562


Risk Estimate


Odds Ratio for kelengkapanimunisasi (lengkap / tidaklengkap)

1.518 .372 6.197

For cohort status gizi balita =baik 1.234 .574 2.650

For cohort status gizi balita =kurang .813 .426 1.550

N of Valid Cases 71


penyakit penyerta * status gizi balita

penyakit penyerta * status gizi balita Crosstabulationstatus gizi balita

Totalbaik kurangpenyakit penyerta tidak ada Count 28 9 37

% within penyakit penyerta 75.7% 24.3% 100.0%% of Total 39.4% 12.7% 52.1%

ada Count 10 24 34% within penyakit penyerta 29.4% 70.6% 100.0%% of Total 14.1% 33.8% 47.9%

Total Count 38 33 71% within penyakit penyerta 53.5% 46.5% 100.0%% of Total 53.5% 46.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests




sided)Pearson Chi-Square 15.245a 1 .000Continuity Correctionb 13.442 1 .000Likelihood Ratio 15.826 1 .000Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000Linear-by-Linear Association 15.030 1 .000N of Valid Cases 71a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15.80.b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value95% Confidence Interval

Lower UpperOdds Ratio for penyakitpenyerta (tidak ada / ada) 7.467 2.606 21.395

For cohort status gizi balita= baik 2.573 1.482 4.468

For cohort status gizi balita= kurang .345 .188 .633

N of Valid Cases 71


pemberian ASI * status gizi balita


Totalbaik kurangpemberian ASI diberikan Count 27 5 32

% within pemberian ASI 84.4% 15.6% 100.0%% of Total 38.0% 7.0% 45.1%

tidak diberikan Count 11 28 39% within pemberian ASI 28.2% 71.8% 100.0%% of Total 15.5% 39.4% 54.9%

Total Count 38 33 71% within pemberian ASI 53.5% 46.5% 100.0%% of Total 53.5% 46.5% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests




sided)Pearson Chi-Square 22.294a 1 .000Continuity Correctionb

20.093 1 .000Likelihood Ratio 23.936 1 .000Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000Linear-by-Linear Association 21.980 1 .000N of Valid Cases 71a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.87.b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate


Odds Ratio for pemberian ASI(diberikan / tidak diberikan) 8.745 4.215 44.820



N of Valid Cases 71


Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 10.200 1 .001

Block 10.200 1 .001

Model 10.200 1 .001


Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 3.468 1 .063

Block 3.468 1 .063

Model 3.468 1 .063


Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 40.590 1 .000

Block 40.590 1 .000

Model 40.590 1 .000


Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step .340 1 .560

Block .340 1 .560

Model .340 1 .560


Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 15.826 1 .000

Block 15.826 1 .000

Model 15.826 1 .000


Chi-square df Sig.

Step 1 Step 23.936 1 .000

Block 23.936 1 .000

Model 23.936 1 .000


Logistic Regression

Case Processing SummaryUnweighted Casesa N PercentSelected Cases Included in Analysis 71 100.0

Missing Cases 0 .0Total 71 100.0

Unselected Cases 0 .0Total 71 100.0a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable EncodingOriginal Value Internal Valuebaik 0kurang 1

Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Tablea,b

Observed

Predictedstatus gizi balita Percentage

Correctbaik kurangStep 0 status gizi balita baik 38 0 100.0

kurang 33 0 .0Overall Percentage 53.5

a. Constant is included in the model.b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the EquationB S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -.141 .238 .352 1 .553 .868

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.Step 0 Variables pengetahuanibu 9.836 1 .002

sosial_ekonomi 3.431 1 .064polapem_makanan 35.440 1 .000penyakit_penyerta 15.245 1 .000pemberian_ASI 22.294 1 .000

Overall Statistics 48.028 5 .000


Block 1: Method = Enter


Chi-square df Sig.Step 1 Step 67.555 5 .000

Block 67.555 5 .000Model 67.555 5 .000

Model Summary

Step -2 Log likelihoodCox & Snell R

SquareNagelkerke R

Square1 30.520a .614 .820a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameterestimates changed by less than .001.

Classification Tablea

Observed



kurang 3 30 90.9Overall Percentage 90.1

a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

95% C.I.forEXP(B)

Lower UpperStep1a

pengetahuanibu 3.090 1.242 6.187 1 .013 6.971 1.925 25.720sosial_ekonomi 1.059 1.248 .719 1 .396 2.883 .250 33.298polapem_makanan 3.779 1.388 7.411 1 .006 7.789 2.882 25.374

penyakit_penyerta 5.091 1.652 9.494 1 .002 6.498 6.376 41.331

pemberian_ASI .994 1.429 .484 1 .487 2.702 .164 44.479Constant -7.649 1.954 15.325 1 .000 .000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuanibu, sosial_ekonomi, polapem_makanan,penyakit_penyerta, pemberian_ASI.


Logistic Regression







Observed






B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)Step 0 Constant -.141 .238 .352 1 .553 .868

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.Step 0 Variables pengetahuanibu 9.836 1 .002

sosial_ekonomi 3.431 1 .064polapem_makanan 35.440 1 .000penyakit_penyerta 15.245 1 .000






Block 67.057 4 .000Model 67.057 4 .000

Model Summary


SquareNagelkerke R



Observed







95% C.I.forEXP(B)

Lower UpperStep1a

pengetahuanibu 3.282 1.243 6.973 1 .008 6.635 2.330 34.428sosial_ekonomi 1.334 1.173 1.293 1 .255 3.797 .381 37.857polapem_makanan 4.271 1.225 12.145 1 .000 7.568 2.481 29.346


Constant -7.618 1.973 14.901 1 .000 .000a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuanibu, sosial_ekonomi, polapem_makanan,penyakit_penyerta.


Logistic Regression







Observed





Variables in the EquationB S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -.141 .238 .352 1 .553 .868

Variables not in the EquationScore df Sig.

Step 0 Variables pengetahuanibu 9.836 1 .002polapem_makanan 35.440 1 .000penyakit_penyerta 15.245 1 .000






Block 65.730 3 .000Model 65.730 3 .000

Model Summary


SquareNagelkerke R



Observed







95% C.I.forEXP(B)

Lower UpperStep1a

pengetahuanibu 3.146 1.208 6.785 1 .009 5.239 2.179 24.859polapem_makanan 4.553 1.213 14.088 1 .000 6.906 2.806 22.805


Constant -6.712 1.644 16.671 1 .000 .001a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: pengetahuanibu, polapem_makanan, penyakit_penyerta.


SURAT PENELITIAN


PETA LOKASI PENELITIAN


DOKUMENTASI


KUESIONERrepository.sari-mutiara.ac.id/188/3/APPENDIX.pdf · kuesioner faktor-faktor yang...

Documents

Transcript of KUESIONERrepository.sari-mutiara.ac.id/188/3/APPENDIX.pdf · kuesioner faktor-faktor yang...