HUBUNGAN IMAJINASI KREATIF DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR ...

HUBUNGAN IMAJINASI KREATIF DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR

KREATIF DENGAN KETERAMPILAN MEMBUAT PRODUK KREATIF

BERPOTENSI WIRAUSAHA PADA MATA KULIAH

BIOENTREPRENEUR

TESIS

diajukan untuk memenuhi sebagian syarat untuk memperoleh gelar

Magister Pendidikan Biologi

Oleh:

Ahmad Ahyani

(1803189)

PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BIOLOGI

DEPARTEMEN PENDIDIKAN BIOLOGI

FAKULTAS PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA DAN

ILMU PENGETAHUAN ALAM

UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA

2021

ii

Ahmad Ahyani, 2021 HUBUNGAN IMAJINASI KREATIF DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KREATIF DENGAN KETERAMPILAN MEMBUAT PRODUK KREATIF BERPOTENSI WIRAUSAHA PADA MATA KULIAH BIOENTREPRENEUR Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu




BIOENTREPRENEUR

Oleh

Ahmad Ahyani

S.Pd Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, 2017

Sebuah Tesis yang diajukan untuk memenuhi salah satu syarat memperoleh gelar

Magister Pendidikan (M.Pd.) pada Fakultas Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu

Pengetahuan Alam

© Ahmad Ahyani 2021

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Agustus 2021

Hak Cipta dilindungi undang-undang.

Tesis ini tidak boleh diperbanyak seluruhya atau sebagian,

dengan dicetak ulang, difoto kopi, atau cara lainnya tanpa ijin dari penulis.

iii


HALAMAN PENGESAHAN TESIS

AHMAD AHYANI




BIOENTREPRENEUR

Disetujui dan disahkan oleh pembimbing:

Pembimbing I,

Dr. Bambang Supriatno, M.Si.

NIP. 196305211988031002

Pembimbing II,

Dr. Wahyu Surakusumah, S.Si., M.T.

NIP. 197212301999031001

Mengetahui,

Ketua Departemen Pendidikan Biologi

Dr. Bambang Supriatno, M.Si.

NIP. 196305211988031002

vii


ABSTRAK

Hubungan Imajinasi Kreatif dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif dengan

Keterampilan Membuat Produk Kreatif Berpotensi Wirausaha pada Mata

Kuliah Bioentrepreneur

Telah dilakukan penelitian tentang hubungan imajinasi kreatif dan

keterampilan berpikir kreatif dengan keterampilan membuat produk kreatif

berpotensi wirausaha pada mata kuliah bioentrepreneur. Tujuan penelitian

ini adalah menganalisis hubungan imajinasi kreatif dan keterampilan

berpikir kreatif dengan keterampilan membuat produk kreatif berpotensi

wirausaha. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode korelasional. Responden

adalah 26 mahasiswa mata kuliah bioentrepreneur. Instrumen yang

digunakan yaitu tes wartegg, lembar penilaian proposal bioentrepreneur,

dan lembar penilaian produk kreatif berpotensi wirausaha. Hasil penelitian

menunjukkan 46,2% mahasiswa memiliki kemampuan imajinasi kreatif

pada kategori sedang bagian bawah, 38,5% mahasiswa memiliki

keterampilan berpikir kreatif pada tingkatan rata-rata, dan 38,5%

mahasiswa memiliki keterampilan membuat produk kreatif pada kategori

rendah. Tidak terdapat korelasi antara kemampuan imajinasi kreatif dengan

keterampilan berpikir kreatif (r = -0,082, [0,05 < Sig. 0,692]). Tidak

terdapat korelasi antara kemampuan imajinasi kreatif dengan keterampilan

membuat produk kreatif berpotensi wirausaha (r = 0,038, [0,05 < Sig.

0,855]). Terdapat korelasi kuat antara keterampilan berpikir kreatif dengan

keterampilan membuat produk kreatif berpotensi wirausaha (r = 0,632,

[0,05 > Sig. 0,001]). Terdapat korelasi kuat antara kemampuan imajinasi

kreatif dan keterampialan berpikir kreatif secara simultan dengan

keterampilan membuat produk kreatif berpotensi wirausaha (R = 0,659,

[0,005 > Sig. F Change 0,001]).

Kata kunci: Imajinasi kreatif, berpikir kreatif, produk kreatif,

bioentrepreneur.

viii


ABSTRACT

The Relationship of Creative Imagination Skills and Creative Thinking Skills

with The Skills to Make Creative Products that Have Entrepreneurial

Potential in The Bioentrepreneur Course

Research has been conducted on the relationship between creative

imagination and creative thinking skills with the skills to make creative

products that have entrepreneurial potential in the bioentrepreneur course.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between creative

imagination and creative thinking skills with the skills to make creative

products that have entrepreneurial potential. The method used is the

correlation method. The respondents were 26 students of the

bioentrepreneur course. The instruments used are the Wartegg test, the

bioentrepreneur proposal assessment sheet, and the assessment sheet for

creative products that have entrepreneurial potential. The results showed

that 46.2% of students had creative imagination skills in the medium

category, 38.5% of students had creative thinking skills at the moderate

level, and 38.5% of students had creative product skills in the low category.

There is no relationship between creative imagination ability and creative

thinking ability (r = -0,082, [0,05 < Sig. 0,692]). There is no relationship

between the ability of creative imagination and skills to make creative

products with entrepreneurial potential (r = 0,038, [0,05 < Sig. 0,855]).

There is a strong relationship between creative thinking skills and skills to

make creative products with entrepreneurial potential (r = 0,632, [0,05 >

Sig. 0,001]). There is a strong relationship between the ability of creative

imagination and creative thinking skills simultaneously with skills to make

creative products with entrepreneurial potential (R = 0,659, [0,005 > Sig. F

Change 0,001]).

Keywords: Creative imagination, creative thinking, creative products,

bioentrepreneur.

ix


DAFTAR ISI

Halaman

HALAMAN PENGESAHAN TESIS .................................................................... iii

LEMBAR PERNYATAAN ................................................................................... iv

KATA PENGANTAR ............................................................................................ v

UCAPAN TERIMA KASIH .................................................................................. vi

ABSTRAK ............................................................................................................ vii

ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................... viii

DAFTAR ISI .......................................................................................................... ix

DAFTAR TABEL ................................................................................................. xii

DAFTAR GAMBAR ........................................................................................... xiv

DAFTAR LAMPIRAN ......................................................................................... xv

BAB I PENDAHULUAN ....................................................................................... 1

A. Latar Belakang Masalah ........................................................................... 1

B. Rumusan Masalah .................................................................................... 6

C. Batasan Masalah ....................................................................................... 7

D. Tujuan Penelitian ...................................................................................... 7

E. Hipotesis Penelitian .................................................................................. 8

F. Manfaat Penelitian .................................................................................... 9

BAB II KAJIAN PUSTAKA ................................................................................ 10

A. Bioentrepreneurship ............................................................................... 10

B. Kewirausahaan ....................................................................................... 11

C. Kreativitas .............................................................................................. 13

D. Imajinasi Kreatif ..................................................................................... 17

E. Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif ................................................................ 18

F. Produk Kreatif Berpotensi Wirausaha .................................................... 19

G. Hubungan imajinasi kreatif dan berpikir kreatif dengan produk kreatif 21

H. Biologi dalam Bioentrepreneurship ....................................................... 23

I. Penelitian yang Relevan ......................................................................... 23

BAB III METODE PENELITIAN........................................................................ 25

A. Metode dan Desain Penelitian ................................................................ 25

x


B. Tempat dan Waktu Penelitian ................................................................ 25

C. Populasi dan Sampel Penelitian ............................................................. 26

D. Variabel Penelitian ................................................................................. 26

E. Definisi Operasional ............................................................................... 26

F. Sumber Data ........................................................................................... 28

G. Instrumen Penelitian ............................................................................... 28

H. Teknik Analisis Instrumen ..................................................................... 38

I. Teknik Analisis Data .............................................................................. 44

J. Prosedur Penelitian ................................................................................. 51

K. Alur Penelitian ........................................................................................ 53

BAB IV TEMUAN DAN PEMBAHASAN ......................................................... 54

A. Proses perkuliahan pada mata kuliah bioentrepreneur .......................... 54

B. Profil imajinasi kreatif mahasiswa pada mata kuliah bioentrepreneur .. 56

C. Profil keterampilan berpikir kreatif mahasiswa pada mata kuliah

bioentrepreneur ................................................................................................. 65

D. Profil keterampilan membuat produk kreatif berpotensi wirausaha pada

mata kuliah bioentrepreneur ............................................................................. 76

E. Normalitas Data Kemampuan Imajinasi Kreatif, Keterampilan Berpikir

Kreatif, dan Keterampilan Membuat Produk Kreatif Berpotensi Wirausaha.... 86

F. Hubungan Kemampuan Imajinasi Kreatif dengan Keterampilan Berpikir

Kreatif ................................................................................................................ 87

G. Hubungan Kemampuan Imajinasi Kreatif dengan Keterampilan Membuat

Produk Kreatif Berpotensi Wirausaha ............................................................... 90

H. Hubungan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif dengan Keterampilan Membuat

Produk Kreatif Berpotensi Wirausaha ............................................................... 92

I. Hubungan Imajinasi Kreatif dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif dengan

Keterampilan Membuat Produk Kreatif Berpotensi Wirausaha ........................ 95

BAB V SIMPULAN, IMPLIKASI DAN REKOMENDASI ............................. 100

A. Simpulan ............................................................................................... 100

B. Implikasi ............................................................................................... 100

C. Rekomendasi ........................................................................................ 101

DAFTAR PUSTAKA ......................................................................................... 103

xi


LAMPIRAN ........................................................................................................ 112

xii


DAFTAR TABEL

Tabel 2. 1 Ciri-ciri Sikap Kewirausahaan ............................................................. 13

Tabel 2. 2 Perbandingan bentuk kreativitas berdasarkan pendapat ahli ............... 15

Tabel 2. 3 Indikator Karakter Orang yang Kreatif ................................................ 16

Tabel 2. 4 Indikator Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif.............................................. 19

Tabel 2. 5 Kriteria Produk Kreatif ........................................................................ 20

Tabel 3. 1 Instrumen penelitian ............................................................................. 28

Tabel 3. 2 Pedoman Penilaian Imajinasi Kreatif Pada Tes Wartegg .................... 30

Tabel 3. 3 Kisi-Kisi Rubrik Penilaian Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Pada Proposal

Bioenterpreneur ..................................................................................................... 33

Tabel 3. 4 Rubrik Penilaian keterampilan berpikir kreatif pada proposal

bioenterpreneur ..................................................................................................... 34

Tabel 3. 5 Kisi-Kisi Rubrik Penilaian keterampilan membuat produk kreatif

berpotensi wirausaha ............................................................................................. 36

Tabel 3. 6 Rubrik Penilaian keterampilan membuat produk kreatif berpotensi

wirausaha............................................................................................................... 36

Tabel 3. 7 Kategori koefisien reliabilitas .............................................................. 39

Tabel 3. 8 Hasil uji validitas instrument tes wartegg untuk menilai kemampuan

imajinasi kreatif ..................................................................................................... 40

Tabel 3. 9 Hasil uji reliabilitas instrument tes wartegg untuk menilai kemampuan

imajinasi kreatif ..................................................................................................... 40

Tabel 3. 10 Hasil uji validitas instrumen penilaian keterampilan berpikir kreatif 41

Tabel 3. 11 Hasil uji reliabilitas instrument penilaian keterampilan berpikir kreatif

............................................................................................................................... 42

Tabel 3. 12 Hasil uji validitas instrumen penilaian keterampilan membuat produk

kreatif berpotensi wirausaha ................................................................................. 42

Tabel 3. 13 Hasil uji reliabilitas instrument penilaian keterampilan membuat produk

kreatif berpotensi wirausaha ................................................................................. 43

Tabel 3. 14 Kategori Imajinasi Kreatif ................................................................. 45

xiii


Tabel 3. 15 Hubungan antara Nilai Persentase Jumlah Mahasiswa dengan Tafsiran

............................................................................................................................... 45

Tabel 3. 16 Kategori Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif ............................................ 46

Tabel 3. 17 Kategori Keterampilan Membuat Produk Kreatif Berpotensi wirausaha

............................................................................................................................... 47

Tabel 3. 18 Kriteria Koefisien Korelasi ................................................................ 51

Tabel 4. 1 Hasil uji normalitas .............................................................................. 86

Tabel 4. 2 Hasil Uji Korelasi antara Kemampuan Imajinasi Kreatif dengan

Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif .............................................................................. 87

Tabel 4. 3 Hasil Uji Korelasi antara Kemampuan Imajinasi Kreatif dengan

Keterampilan Membuat Produk Kreatif Berpotensi Wirausaha ........................... 91

Tabel 4. 4 Hasil Uji Korelasi antara Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif dengan

Keterampilan Membuat Produk Kreatif Berpotensi Wirausaha ........................... 93

Tabel 4. 5 Hasil Uji Korelasi Ganda Kemampuan Imajinasi Kreatif dan

Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif dengan Keterampilan Membuat Produk Kreatif

Berpotensi Wirausaha ........................................................................................... 95

xiv


DAFTAR GAMBAR

Gambar 3. 1 Pola Hubungan ................................................................................. 25

Gambar 3. 2 Alur Pelaksanaan Penelitian ............................................................. 53

Gambar 4. 1 Persentase kategori skor imajinasi kreatif mahasiswa berdasarkan tes

wartegg .................................................................................................................. 56

Gambar 4. 2 Contoh hasil tes dalam kategori imajinasi kreatif tinggi .................. 57

Gambar 4. 3 Contoh hasil tes dalam kategori imajinasi kreatif rendah ................ 58

Gambar 4. 4 Perbandingan persentase kategori skor mahasiswa pada setiap aspek

imajinsi kreatif ...................................................................................................... 59

Gambar 4. 5 Persentase kategori skor keterampilan berpikir kreatif mahasiswa . 66


berpikir kreatif ....................................................................................................... 68

Gambar 4. 7 Persentase Kategori Skor Keterampilan Membuat Produk Kreatif

Berpotensi Wirausaha ........................................................................................... 77

Gambar 4. 8 Contoh produk kreatif berpotensi wirausaha pada kategori tinggi .. 78

Gambar 4. 9 Contoh produk kreatif berpotensi wirausaha pada kategori rendah . 78

Gambar 4. 10 Logo CoRi Oat Bar ........................................................................ 79

Gambar 4. 11 Logo Kecafruits .............................................................................. 79


produk kreatif berpotensi wirausaha ..................................................................... 81

xv


DAFTAR LAMPIRAN

Lampiran 1. Hasil Penilaian Imajinasi Kreatif ..................................................... 113

Lampiran 2. Rekapitulasi Hasil Tes Imajinasi Kreatif Menggunakan Tes Wartegg

.............................................................................................................................. 116

Lampiran 3. Rekapitulasi Hasil Penilaian Berpikir Kreatif Berdasarkan Proposal

Bioentrepreneur .................................................................................................... 117

Lampiran 4. Rekapitulasi Hasil Penilaian Kemempuan Membuat Produk Kreatif

Pada Mata kuliah Bioentrepreneur ....................................................................... 119

Lampiran 5. Contoh Proposal Bioentrepreneur Mahasiswa ................................ 121

Lampiran 6. Contoh Produk Bioentrepreneur Mahasiswa ................................... 137

Lampiran 7. Hasil Uji Validitas Instrumen Penilaian Kemampuan Imajinasi Kreatif

.............................................................................................................................. 144

Lampiran 8. Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Instrumen Penilaian Kemampuan Imajinasi

Kreatif .................................................................................................................. 145

Lampiran 9. Hasil Uji Validitas Instrumen Penilaian Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif

.............................................................................................................................. 146

Lampiran 10. Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Instrumen Penilaian Keterampilan Berpikir

Kreatif .................................................................................................................. 147

Lampiran 11. Hasil Uji Validitas Instrumen Penilaian Keterampilan Membuat

Produk Kreatif Berpotensi Wirausaha ................................................................. 148

Lampiran 12. Hasil Uji Reliabilitas Instrumen Penilaian Keterampilan Membuat

Produk Kreatif Berpotensi Wirausaha ................................................................. 149

Lampiran 13. Hasil Uji Normalitas Data ............................................................. 150

Lampiran 14. Hasil Uji Korelasi Sederhana dan Korelasi Ganda ........................ 151

103


DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Ahyani, A., Supriatno, B., & Surakusumah, W. (2021). Identification of creative

imaginations of biology education students based on the wartegg test. Journal

of Physics: Conference Series, 1806. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-

6596/1806/1/012168

Anwar, M., Supardi, & Sugiharto, D. (2012). Pengembangan Perangkat

Pembelajaran Biologi Dengan Pendekatan Bioenterpreneurship Untuk

Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Ilmiah Dan Minat Berwirausaha Siswa.

Innovative Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology, 1(1).

Arikunto, S. (2011). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Aruan, S. A., Okere, M. I. O., & Wachanga, S. (2016). Influence of Culture and

Gender on Secondary School Students’ Scientific Creativity in Biology

Education in Turkana County, Kenya. Journal of Education and Practice,

7(35), 25–35. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1126506

Azwar, S. (2018). Wartegg Tes Melengkapi Gambar. Pustaka Pelajar.

Baron, R. A. (1998). Cognitive Mechanisms in Entrepreneurship: Why and When

Enterpreneurs Think Differently than Other People. Journal of Business

Venturing, 13(4), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00031-1

Beal, O. (1998). Assessing the Creative Abilities of Primary School Children.

University of Central Lancashire.

Besemer, S. P., & Treffinger, D. J. (1981). Analysis of Creative Products: Review

and Synthesis. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 15(3), 158–178.

https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1981.tb00287.x

BINUS University. (2019). Sikap-Sikap Seorang Entrepreneurs.

https://binus.ac.id/bandung/2019/10/sikap-sikap-seorang-entrepreneurs/

Brennecke, D., Duarte, B., Paiva, F., Caçador, I., & Canning-Clode, J. (2016).

Microplastics as Vector for Heavy Metal Contamination from The Marine

Environment. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 178, 189–195.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2015.12.003

Cotantino, T., Kellam, N., Cramond, B., & Crowder, I. (2010). An Interdisciplinary

Design Studio: How Can Art and Engineering Collaborate to Increase

Students’ Creativity? Art Education, 63(2), 49–53.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2010.11519062

104


Creswell. (2015). Riset Perencanaan, dan evaluasi riset kualitatif dan kuantitatif

Pendidikan. Pustaka Pelajar.

Dahlan, J., Kusumah, Y., & Sutarno, M. (2011). Pengembangan Model Computer-

Based E-Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan High Order

Mathematical Thinking Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan

Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 16(2), 71–77.

https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v16i2.222

Damayanthi, A. (2020). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Daring di Masa Pandemi Covid

19 pada Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Katolik. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan,

19(3), 189–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/e.v1i3.26978

Dewantara, J. A., & Nurgiansah, T. H. (2021). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Daring di

Masa Pandemi COVID 19 Bagi Mahasiswa Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta.

Jurnal Basicedu, 5(1), 367–375. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i1.669

Direktorat Jenderal Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan. (2019). Panduan

Penyusunan Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi di Era Industri 4.0 (3rd ed.).

Direktorat Jenderal Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan Kementerian Riset

Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi.

Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. (2020). Buku Panduan Merdeka Belajar -

Kampus Merdeka (1st ed.). Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi

Kemdikbud RI. http://dikti.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-

content/uploads/2020/04/Buku-Panduan-Merdeka-Belajar-Kampus-

Merdeka-2020

Dole, S. (2018). Creativity in Education: A Global Concern. Global Education

Review, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.62780

Drucker, P. F. (1993). Innovation and Entrepreneurship Practice and Principles.

Harper Collins Publisher.

Ernawati, S., & Kurniawati, U. (2020). Pengaruh Kreatifitas Produk Dan Inovasi

Produk Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen Di Steak House Noodles.

ISOQUANT : Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 4(1), 112–119.

https://doi.org/10.24269/iso.v4i1.399

Fatmawati, B. (2011). Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek untuk Meningkatkan

Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 16(2),

85–92. https://doi.org/10.33627/oz.v7i2.6

Feri, L., & Jahrir, A. S. (2020). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Daring di Tengah

Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Daerah Serta

Pembelajarannya, 1(1).

Filsaime, & Dennis, K. (2008). Menguak Rahasia Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif.

Prestasi Pustaka.

105


Firdaus, H. M., Widodo, A., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan

Berpikir Kreatif dan Proses Pengembangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif

Siswa SMP pada Pembelajaran Biologi. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of

Biology Education, 1(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v1i1.11452

Florida, R., Mellander, C., & King, K. (2015). The Global Creativity Index 2015.

In Martin Prosperity Institute. http://martinprosperity.org/media/Global-

Creativity-Index-2015.pdf

Garcês, S., Pocinho, M., De Jesus, S. N., & Viseu, J. (2016). The impact of the

creative environment on the creative person, process, and product. Avaliacao

Psicologica, 15(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2016.1502.05

Garcia, J. G., & Mukhopadhyay, T. P. (2019). The role and efficacy of creative

imagination in concept formation: A study of variables for children in primary

school. Education Sciences, 9(3), 1–18.

https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030175

Groh, K. J., Backhaus, T., Carney-Almroth, B., Geueke, B., Inostroza, P. A.,

Lennquist, A., Leslie, H. A., Maffini, M., Slunge, D., Trasande, L., Warhurst,

A. M., & Muncke, J. (2019). Overview of Known Plastic Packaging-

Associated Chemicals and Their Hazards. Science of the Total Environment,

651, 3253–3268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.015

Grønnerød, J. S., & Grønnerød, C. (2012). The wartegg zeichen test: A literature

overview and a meta-analysis of reliability and validity. Psychological

Assessment, 24(2), 476–489. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026100

Gunawan, Harjono, A., Sahidu, H., & Nisrina. (2018). Improving Students’

Creativity Using Cooperative Learning With Virtual Media on Static Fluida

Concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1006, 1–6.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012016

Gündoğan, A. (2019). The Test of Creative Imagination: making the test suitable

to the age group of 5–6 years. Early Child Development and Care, 189(8),

1219–1227. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1372429

Hairuddin, K. (2017). Kreatif Mencipta Produk. Progressio.

Harris, A., & de Bruin, L. R. (2018). Secondary school creativity, teacher practice

and STEAM education: An international study. Journal of Educational

Change, 19(2), 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9311-2

Hatthakijphong, P., & Ting, H.-I. (2019). Prioritizing Successful Entrepreneurial

Skills: An Emphasis on the Perspectives of Entrepreneurs Versus Aspiring

Entrepreneurs. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 34, 1–13.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100603

Hendro. (2011). Dasar-Dasar Kewirausahaan Panduan bagi Mahasiswa untuk

106


Mengenal, Memahami, dan Memasuki Dunia Bisnis. Erlangga.

Hennessey, B. A., Amabile, T. M., & Mueller, J. S. (2011). Consensual

Assessment. In Encyclopedia of Creativity (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Elsevier Inc.

https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-375038-9.00046-7

Henriksen, D., Henderson, M., Creely, E., Ceretkova, S., Cernochova, M.,

Sendova, E., Sointu, E. T., & Tienken, C. H. (2018). Creativity and

Technology in Education: An International Perspective. Technology,

Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-

018-9380-1

Horan, R. (2007). The relationship between creativity and intelligence: A combined

yogic-scientific approach. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2–3), 179–202.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410701397230

Hsu, Y., Peng, L.-P., Wang, J.-H., & Liang, C. (2014). Revising the Imaginative

Capability and Creative Capability Scales: Testing the Relationship between

Imagination and Creativity among Agriculture Students. International

Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 6(1), 57–70.

http://ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/download/118/45

Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S., Dung, J. J., & Yang, Y. L. (2007). Multiple

representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving

using a multimedia whiteboard system. Educational Technology and Society,

10(2), 191–212.

Ibert, O., Jackson, G., Theel, T., & Vogelgsang, L. (2018). Uncertainty as an asset

for creativity ? Dynamic shifts between embracing , ignoring and fixing

uncertainty : the cases of music and pharma. Organized Creativity Discussion

Paper, 18(1), 1–24. https://www.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/forschung/organized-

creativity/media/Ibert_et_al_2018_Disc.pdf

Jackson, P. W., & Messick, S. (1965). The Person, the Product, and the Response:

Conceptual Problems in the Assessment of Creativity. Journal of Personality,

33(3), 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1965.tb01389.x

Jankowska, D. M., Gajda, A., & Karwowski, M. (2019). How children’s creative

visual imagination and creative thinking relate to their representation of space.

International Journal of Science Education, 41(8), 1096–1117.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1594441

Jankowska, D. M., & Karwowski, M. (2015). Measuring creative imagery abilities.

Frontiers in Psychology, 6(OCT), 1–17.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01591

Kautz, T., Heckman, J., Diris, R., Weel, B. ter, & Borghans, L. (2014). Fostering

and Measuring Skills : Non-Cognitive Skills to Promote Lifetime Success. In

OECD Education Working Papers (Issue 110).

107


https://doi.org/10.1787/19939019

Khamidah, N. (2005). Analisis Pengaruh Faktor Lingkungan Terhadap Inovasi

Produk dan Kreativitas Strategi Pemasaran terhadap Kinerja Pemasaran (Studi

pada Perusahaan Kerajinan Keramik di Sentra Industri Kasongan, Kabupaten

bantu, Yogyakarta). Jurnal Sains Pemasaran Indonesia, 4(3), 231–246.

https://doi.org/10.14710/jspi.v4i3.231-246

Laird, A. W. (1964). Differential Analysis of Creativity and Imagination Between

Gifted and Non-Gifted High School Students as Ascertained by The Kinget

Drawing-Completion Test. The University of Oklahoma.

Lew, K., Park, J., Lee, K., & Kang, S. (2013). The Relationship Among Creativity

Thinking Ability, Creative Personality and Creative Product. Advanced

Science and Technology Letters, 36(Education), 58–62.

https://doi.org/10.14257/astl.2013.36.14

Lucas, B., Claxton, G., Spencer, E., Lucas, B., Claxton, G., & Spencer, E. (2013).

Progression in Student Creativity in School Formative Assessments. OECD

Education Working Papers, 86, 1–45.

https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k4dp59msdwk-en

McDermott, M. M., & Newman, A. B. (2020). Preserving Clinical Trial Integrity

During the Coronavirus Pandemic. JAMA, 323(21), 2135–2136.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.4689

Meyers, A. D. (2008). Enterprise for Life Scientists: Developing Innovation and

Entrepreneurship in the Biosciences. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology,

14(4), 355–356. https://doi.org/10.1057/jcb.2008.21

Morris, W. (2006). Creativity: Its Place in Education. jpb.com.

http://www.jpb.com/creative/Creativity_in_Education.pdf

Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. (2012). Creative Thinking:

Processes, Strategies, and Knowledge. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1),

30–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.003

Munandar, U. (2014). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Rineka Cipta.

Olszewski-Kubilius, P., Subotnik, R. F., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Aiming Talent

Development Toward Creative Eminence in the 21st Century. Roeper Review,

38(3), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2016.1184497

Oosterbeek, H., van Praag, M., & Ijsselstein, A. (2010). The impact of

entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation.

European Economic Review, 54(3), 442–454.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009.08.002

Patmawati, K., Puspitasari, N., Mutmainah, S. N., & Maret, U. S. (2018). Profil

Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Akademik

108


Mahasiswa. EduSains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika, 7(2), 11–18.

Pérez-Fabello, M. J., & Campos, A. (2011). Dissociative experiences, creative

imagination, and artistic production in students of Fine Arts. Thinking Skills

and Creativity, 6(1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2010.11.001

Permatasari, S. D. A., Budiyono, B., & Pratiwi, H. (2020). Analysis of

mathematical creativity in the field of geometry in junior high school students.

Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1469(1), 0–9.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1469/1/012157

Plucker, J. A., Dow, R. A., & Beghetto, G. T. (2004). The Relation Between Self-

Beliefs and Academic Achievement : A Meta-Analytic Review The Relation

Between Self-Beliefs and Academic Achievement : A Meta-Analytic Review.

Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96.

https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1

Reisman, F., & Torrance, E. P. (1979). Comparison of Children’s Performance on

the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking and Selected Piagetian Tasks.

Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED171430

Ren, F., Li, X., Zhang, H., & Wang, L. (2012). Progression of Chinese Students’

Creative Imagination from Elementary Through High School. International

Journal of Science Education, 34(13), 2043–2059.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.709334

Rhodes, M. (1961). An Analysis of Creativity. In Source: The Phi Delta Kappan

(Vol. 42, Issue 7).

Riduwan, & Sunarto. (2012). Pengantar Statistika untuk Penelitian: Pendidikan,

Sosial, Komunikasi, Ekonomi, dan Bisnis. Alfabeta.

Riga, V., & Chronopoulou, E. (2014). Applying Mackinnon’s 4Ps to Foster

Creative Thinking and Creative Behaviours in Kindergarten Children.

Education 3-13, 42(3), 330–345.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2012.692700

Riyadi, A. S., Dharmono, A. N., & Zaini, M. (2018). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif

Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Ekologi

Tumbuhan. BIOEDUKASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(1), 40–44.

https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v11i1.19740

Rodrigues, M. O., Abrantes, N., Gonçalves, F. J. M., Nogueira, H., Marques, J. C.,

& Gonçalves, A. M. M. (2019). Impacts of Plastic Products Used in Daily Life

on The Environment and Human Health: What is Known? Environmental

Toxicology and Pharmacology, 72(June), 103239.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2019.103239

Rohrich, R. J., Hamilton, K. L., Avashia, Y., & Savetsky, I. (2020). The COVID-

109


19 Pandemic: Changing Lives and Lessons Learned. Plastic and

Reconstructive Surgery. Global Open, 8(4), e2854–e2854.

https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002854

Roivainen, E. (2009). A Brief History of the Wartegg Drawing Test. Gestalt Theory

Journal, 31(1), 55–71.

Sabu, N. (2018). The Need for Creativity in Teaching Higher Order Thinking Skills

in Biology. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and

Social Sciences, 8(1), 889–898. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i1/3957

Sadler-Smith, E. (2015). Wallas’ Four-Stage Model of the Creative Process: More

Than Meets the Eye? Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 342–352.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.1087277

Sambada, D. (2012). Peranan Kreativitas Siswa Terhadap Kemampuan

Memecahkan Masalah Fisika Dalam Pembelajaran Kontekstual. Jurnal

Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 2(2), 37–47.

https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v2n2.p37-47

Santrock, J. W. (2010). Psikologi Pendidikan. Kencana.

Schauder, M. J. (2020). A Comparison of Two Approaches for Generating Novel

and Useful Ideas. Akron University.

Setiawan, S. (2018). Prospects and Competitiveness in Creative Economy:

Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Research in Business and

Social Science, 7(2), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v7i2.888

Siswanto, I., Wu, M., & Ko, C. (2020). The Impact of Imagination and Affective

Creativity on University Students ’ Creative Thinking : A Verification through

Structural Equation Model. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity

and Change, 13(12), 371–389.

Solihat, R., Wirjosoemarto, K., & Sumarno, U. (2004). PROFIL KEPRIBADIAN

KREATIF DAN MOTIVASI SISWA DALAM PELAKSANAAN

KEGIATAN PRAKTIKUM BIOLOGI DI SMU. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA,

5(2), 25–33.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif,

Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Supriatno, B., Suwandi, T., Kusumawaty, D., & Ahyani, A. (2020).

Bioentrepreneurship Pengantar Teori dan Praktik Membangun Usaha.

Pusaka Media.

Suryana, Y., & Bayu, K. (2015). Kewirausahaan Pendekatan Karakteristik

Wirausahawan Sukses. Prenadamedia Group.

Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and

110


Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science

Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Tawie, R., Neging, M., & Khan, M. Y. M. A. (2017). Preliminary study on

creativity in higher education: Perceptions of engineering instructors. 2017

IEEE 9th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), 28–

32. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2017.8251159

Thompson, N. A. (2018). Imagination and Creativity in Organizations.

Organization Studies, 39(2–3), 229–250.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617736939

Torrance, E. P. (1968). Minnesota Studies of Creative Behavior 1958-1966.

Creativity Research Institute of the Richardson Foundation.

Torrance, E. P. (1972). Can We Teach Children To Think Creatively?*. The

Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(2), 114–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-

6057.1972.tb00923.x

Torrance, E. P. (1977). Creativity in The Classroom: What Research Says To The

Teacher. National Education Association.

Tristiawati, P. (2020). Akibat Corona, 13 Perusahaan di Tangerang Bangkrut dan

PHK Ribuan Karyawan. Liputan6.Com.

https://www.liputan6.com/bisnis/read/4297306/akibat-corona-13-

perusahaan-di-tangerang-bangkrut-dan-phk-ribuan-karyawan

Tsai, K. C. (2012). Play, Imagination, and Creativity: A Brief Literature Review.

Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 15–20.

https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v1n2p15

Ulfah, Y. M., Khastini, R. O., & Rifqiawati, I. (2018). Developing Creativity and

Entrepreneurial Values in High School Student through Project Based

Learning Model on Biotechnology Concept. EDUSAINS, 10(2), 185–196.

van Griethuijsen, R. A. L. F., van Eijck, M. W., Haste, H., den Brok, P. J., Skinner,

N. C., Mansour, N., Gencer, A. S., & BouJaoude, S. (2015). Global patterns

in students’ views of science and interest in science. Research in Science

Education, 45(4), 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9438-6

Very. (2020). BNPB Ajak Multipihak Cari Solusi Permanen Atasi Banjir.

Indonews.Id. https://indonews.id/artikel/27741/BNPB-Ajak-Multipihak-

Cari-Solusi-Permanen-Atasi-Banjir/

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A Comparative Analysis of International

Frameworks for 21 St Century Competences: Implications for National

Curriculum Policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938

Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and Creativity in Childhood. Journal of

111


Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/1927/imagination.pdf

Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem

Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts.

Widodo, A. (2015). Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Siswa. Proceedings

of Seminar Nasional Pendidikan MIPA 2015, 1–8.

Wilson, S. C., & Barber, T. X. (1978). The Creative Imagination Scale as a Measure

of Hypnotic Responsiveness: Applications to Experimental and Clinical

Hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 20(4), 235–249.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1978.10403940

Witerska, K. (2018). The Four Ps of Creativity in the Drama/Theatre Project

Jutka’s Sleeplessness. Creativity, 5(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-

2018-0007

Wulan, A. R. (2018). Menggunakan Asesmen Kinerja untuk Pembelajaran Sains

dan Penelitian. UPI Press.

Yamamoto, K. (1964). Experimental Scoring Manuals for Minnesota Tests of

Creative Thinking and Writing. (O. H. B. of E. R. and S. Kent State Univ.

(ed.)). ERIC Clearinghouse.

http://eric.ed.gov:80/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&

ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED017090&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_

0=no&accno=ED017090

Young, L. F. (1991). Knowledge-Based Systems for Idea Processing Support.

SIGMIS Database, 21(2–3), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1145/109022.109027

Yuana, R. A., Harjunowibowo, D., Karyanta, N. A., & Budiyanto, C. W. (2018).

Data Similarity Filtering of Wartegg Personality Test Result using Cosine-

Similarity. International Journal of Recent Contributions from Engineering,

Science & IT (IJES), 6(3), 19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijes.v6i3.9413

Yuliani, T., Izmuddin, L., & Putri, A. (2020). Pengaruh Inovasi Dan Kreativitas

Produk Terhadap Ketahanan Ekonomi Masyarakat Pada Industri Kerajinan

Kapuk. EKONOMIKA SYARIAH : Journal of Economic Studies, 4(1), 90–110.

https://doi.org/10.30983/es.v4i1.2074

Yusmaliana, D., & Suyadi. (2019). Pengembangan Imajinasi Kreatif Berbasis

Neurosains dalam Pembelajaran Keagamaan Islam. Edukasia: Jurnal

Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 14(2), 267–296.

HUBUNGAN IMAJINASI KREATIF DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR ...

Documents

Transcript of HUBUNGAN IMAJINASI KREATIF DAN KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR ...