Fraction, an integrated perspective

25
Kelompok II 1.Chika Rahayu 2.Dekriati Ate 3.Meta Silvia Gunawan 4.Nursa Fatri Nopriati 5.Sri Widya Permatasari

Transcript of Fraction, an integrated perspective

Page 1: Fraction, an integrated perspective

Kelompok II1.Chika Rahayu2.Dekriati Ate3.Meta Silvia Gunawan4.Nursa Fatri Nopriati5.Sri Widya Permatasari

Page 2: Fraction, an integrated perspective

Fraction, an integrated perspective

1. Concept aquisition and N distractors

Page 3: Fraction, an integrated perspective

Bagaimana membagi 3 batang coklat untuk 4 orang anak sehingga masing-masing anak akan mendapat bagian yang sama!

Page 4: Fraction, an integrated perspective

Ide Clara

Page 5: Fraction, an integrated perspective

Ide Clara

Page 6: Fraction, an integrated perspective

Clara encountered certain difficulties during this early stage of the learning process. She preferred to stick to notations such as or

Page 7: Fraction, an integrated perspective

In the case where eight children were each to receive Clara Suggested giving them all one and then having them all return

Page 8: Fraction, an integrated perspective

?

When asked whether someone receiving

Page 9: Fraction, an integrated perspective

Clara tried to reconstructing the distribution story of the other fraction which is similar with the example before.12+15

Clara first said theat there were 7 people sharing, an answer which can also be regardeda as N distractor error.

Page 10: Fraction, an integrated perspective

𝟏𝟐+

𝟏𝟓

𝟏𝟐+

𝟏𝟓

𝟏𝟐+

𝟏𝟓𝟏𝟐+

𝟏𝟓𝟏𝟐+

𝟏𝟓

𝟑𝟏𝟐𝟑𝟏𝟐

𝟕

5 5

10

710+0=

12+15

Page 11: Fraction, an integrated perspective

Fraction, an integrated perspective

2. Progression in schematising

After 3 weeks, Clara applied another type of abbreviation

Page 12: Fraction, an integrated perspective

58

𝟐𝟏𝟐4 4

Page 13: Fraction, an integrated perspective

4 8 16

20

32

3 6 12

15

24

In Schematisations with the ratio table. Clara constructed table of 4S : 3C

Page 14: Fraction, an integrated perspective

S 18 36 54

C 8 16 24

Comparing

S 14 28 42

56

C 6 12 18

24

Page 15: Fraction, an integrated perspective

Fraction, an integrated perspective

3. Flexible use of models

Page 16: Fraction, an integrated perspective

13

4 13 4 134 13

• Figure 6

15

5 5 5

Page 17: Fraction, an integrated perspective

Figure 7

Page 18: Fraction, an integrated perspective

Figure 8

Page 19: Fraction, an integrated perspective

4. Ability to build of formal problems

=

1

Page 20: Fraction, an integrated perspective

Indicator 5: the pupil’s own constructions and productions

on the symbolic level

By a monograph we mean a series of fractional number sentences fitting to a single distribution in which the fair sharing takes place in different ways.

Page 21: Fraction, an integrated perspective

After 3 ½ months

Two months later

4 months later

+ Up to after

+

Page 22: Fraction, an integrated perspective

The characteristic of Clara’s test were :

• A relatively large number of assignments for practising the main LOT operations

• Translation assignments into LOT language• A few application assignments, with the view on

the definitions of a LOT numbers.• A few assignments for construction and free

production

6 months later

Page 23: Fraction, an integrated perspective

Clara’s process of fraction construction

Concept acquisition and N-distractors

Progression in schematising

Flexible use of models,

application of schemes and

diagrams

The pupil’s own constructions

and productions on the symbolic

level

Ability to build images of

formal problems

LOT test

This may have helped to increase her self-

confidence and her achievement

Page 24: Fraction, an integrated perspective
Page 25: Fraction, an integrated perspective