Data Liliform (2)

11
Analisis N-Gain Kelompok GI Analisis N-Gain no nama N-Gain no nama pretest 1 abdullah 33 60 40 1 ahmad ma 33 2 aditya t 43 70 47 2 adisty p 30 3 almer pr 37 60 37 3 aditya e 37 4 annisa p 23 70 61 4 agi apri 23 5 aprilya 33 60 40 5 andri mu 37 6 ari dwi 33 73 60 6 anisa sy 20 7 arum her 30 53 33 7 anisha p 20 8 attina d 30 70 57 8 arief bu 43 9 bagus dw 30 63 47 9 bagus wi 40 10 chusnan 27 60 45 10 criswant 30 11 dimas sa 33 50 25 11 cyntia m 10 12 dinda ch 23 53 39 12 dara kur 40 13 diva nur 33 63 45 13 dinda ma 43 14 elsa dwi 27 53 36 14 dora set 30 15 erliza f 40 43 5 15 dwi auli 20 16 ester el 27 57 41 16 dwi putr 23 17 fajar nu 20 70 63 17 elsa nur 43 18 fitria a 33 53 30 18 farhan w 23 19 glory ev 23 77 70 19 fatimah 27 20 hafidz a 17 60 52 20 furi rah 17 21 hodirin 43 57 25 21 gilang p 50 22 indira s 30 67 53 22 hanif ha 23 23 ivan mau 40 63 38 23 heny rac 27 24 khairul 30 60 43 24 ilham nu 27 25 khansa r 33 70 55 25 indriyan 27 26 lia june 33 60 40 26 lisa dwi 23 27 meta mel 17 67 60 27 mauli si 27 28 miretaza 47 50 6 28 mira and 33 29 muhamad 20 57 46 29 misbachu 20 30 muhamad 23 77 70 30 muhamad 30 31 mukti al 30 60 43 31 muhamad 30 32 natasya 27 53 36 32 mukti ra 37 33 noni dwi 57 70 30 33 nazula o 43 34 nurinda 33 40 10 34 ni wayan 37 35 nurlaila 40 73 55 35 novi put 43 36 putri al 37 53 25 36 nurul um 33 Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Biologi Melalui Model Pembelajaran Think Pair Share dengan Group Investigation Pada Materi Sistem Reproduksi pre- test post- test

Transcript of Data Liliform (2)

Page 1: Data Liliform (2)

Analisis N-Gain Kelompok GI Analisis N-Gain Kelompok TPSno nama pre-test post-test N-Gain no nama pretest post-test

1 abdullah 33 60 40 1 ahmad mau 33 572 aditya tut 43 70 47 2 adisty putr 30 633 almer prid 37 60 37 3 aditya es 37 634 annisa put 23 70 61 4 agi aprili 23 635 aprilya pr 33 60 40 5 andri muc 37 606 ari dwi an 33 73 60 6 anisa syafi 20 637 arum herli 30 53 33 7 anisha put 20 608 attina dew 30 70 57 8 arief bud 43 639 bagus dwi 30 63 47 9 bagus wij 40 53

10 chusnan bu 27 60 45 10 criswanto 30 5011 dimas sand 33 50 25 11 cyntia ma 10 6012 dinda chae 23 53 39 12 dara kurni 40 6713 diva nurm 33 63 45 13 dinda may 43 5714 elsa dwi o 27 53 36 14 dora setya 30 6315 erliza fhar 40 43 5 15 dwi aulia 20 6016 ester elva 27 57 41 16 dwi putra 23 6317 fajar nugr 20 70 63 17 elsa nurfit 43 6718 fitria andi 33 53 30 18 farhan war 23 5019 glory evel 23 77 70 19 fatimah az 27 6320 hafidz al 17 60 52 20 furi rahay 17 6721 hodirin su 43 57 25 21 gilang per 50 6322 indira son 30 67 53 22 hanif hand 23 4323 ivan maul 40 63 38 23 heny rach 27 6324 khairul u 30 60 43 24 ilham nur 27 5725 khansa res 33 70 55 25 indriyani 27 6726 lia juneta 33 60 40 26 lisa dwian 23 6027 meta melia 17 67 60 27 mauli silm 27 6028 miretazam 47 50 6 28 mira andri 33 6729 muhamad i 20 57 46 29 misbachul 20 6030 muhamad i 23 77 70 30 muhamad r 30 6031 mukti alin 30 60 43 31 muhamad 30 5732 natasya sa 27 53 36 32 mukti ram 37 6033 noni dwi l 57 70 30 33 nazula okt 43 6034 nurinda ta 33 40 10 34 ni wayan c 37 6335 nurlaila sa 40 73 55 35 novi putri 43 7336 putri alvi 37 53 25 36 nurul ummi 33 6737 raditya pr 23 63 52 37 radityo w 23 4738 ratna prat 33 70 55 38 ratih widi 37 6039 renanda a 23 53 39 39 rezky wah 30 60

Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Biologi Melalui Model Pembelajaran Think Pair Share dengan Group Investigation Pada Materi

Sistem Reproduksi

Page 2: Data Liliform (2)

40 rika dwi fi 27 57 41 40 rina melin 40 5341 rizky nuru 37 77 63 41 rizka okta 30 5342 robertus y 20 67 59 42 rizza darm 33 7043 rosmia ra 27 50 32 43 roy sandi 30 5044 sindhi ade 50 63 26 44 sari pitri 47 6345 stevani pr 33 67 51 45 syfa anind 30 7346 taufix alfa 20 57 46 46 wildan put 37 6747 ulfa fatika 30 53 33 47 yulia safit 30 63

total 1458 2872 2005 total 1466 2851

Page 3: Data Liliform (2)

Analisis N-Gain Kelompok TPSN-Gain

364741523754503522295645254750524235496026264941554845515043393730415351313743

Page 4: Data Liliform (2)

2233552930614847

1981

Page 5: Data Liliform (2)

Uji Lilliefors Data Kelompok TPS

No Yi f i f kum Zi

1 22 2 2 44 -20.2340 409.4165 818.8330 -1.952 25 1 3 25 -17.2340 297.0122 297.0122 -1.663 26 2 5 52 -16.2340 263.5441 527.0883 -1.574 29 2 7 58 -13.2340 175.1399 350.2798 -1.285 30 2 9 60 -12.2340 149.6718 299.3436 -1.186

311 10 31 -11.2340 126.2037 126.2037 -1.08

7 33 1 11 33 -9.2340 85.2675 85.2675 -0.898 35 2 13 70 -7.2340 52.3314 104.6627 -0.709 36 1 14 36 -6.2340 38.8633 38.8633 -0.6010 37 3 17 111 -5.2340 27.3952 82.1856 -0.5011 39 1 18 39 -3.2340 10.4590 10.4590 -0.3112 41 3 21 123 -1.2340 1.5229 4.5686 -0.1213 42 1 22 42 -0.2340 0.0548 0.0548 -0.0214 43 2 24 86 0.7660 0.5867 1.1734 0.0715 45 2 26 90 2.7660 7.6505 15.3010 0.2716 47 3 29 141 4.7660 22.7144 68.1431 0.4617 48 2 31 96 5.7660 33.2463 66.4925 0.5618 49 2 33 98 6.7660 45.7782 91.5564 0.6519 50 3 36 150 7.7660 60.3101 180.9303 0.7520 51 2 38 102 8.7660 76.8420 153.6840 0.8521 52 2 40 104 9.7660 95.3739 190.7478 0.9422 53 1 41 53 10.7660 115.9058 115.9058 1.0423 54 1 42 54 11.7660 138.4378 138.4378 1.1324 55 2 44 110 12.7660 162.9697 325.9393 1.2325 56 1 45 56 13.7660 189.5016 189.5016 1.3326 60 1 46 60 17.7660 315.6292 315.6292 1.7127 61 1 47 61 18.7660 352.1612 352.1612 1.81

JML 47 674 1985 9.6809 3253.9896 4950.4255 0.93

Rataan (Ῡ) = 42.23

SD = 107.6179463 =

Lh = 0.0727

Yi.fi (Yi - Ῡ) (Yi - Ῡ)2 fi.(Yi - Ῡ)2

1

).( S

n

YYifi 2

fi

Yi.fi Y

Page 6: Data Liliform (2)

Menentukan Nilai L tabel

L t = L t (0.05) , (47) = 0.1282

L tabel pada α = 5% yaitu :

Kesimpulan Hasil analisis normalitas data melalui uji Lilliefors menunjukkan L hitung < L tabel, sehingga Ho diterima. Artinya, data sampel berasal dari populasi yang berdistribusi normal.

L t = L t (α) , (n)

Page 7: Data Liliform (2)

Z tabel F(Zi) S(Zi) F(Zi) – S(Zi) Lh SD

Rataan (Ῡ) =

0.4744 0.0256 0.0426 -0.0170 10.370.4515 0.0485 0.0638 -0.01530.4418 0.0582 0.1064 -0.0482 Lt = 0.12820.3997 0.1003 0.1489 -0.0486 Lh = 0.0727

0.381 0.119 0.1915 -0.07250.3599 0.1401 0.2128 -0.0727 Lh

Lh < Lt maka Ho diterima0.3133 0.1867 0.2340 -0.0473

0.258 0.242 0.2766 -0.03460.2257 0.2743 0.2979 -0.02360.1915 0.3085 0.3617 -0.05320.1217 0.3783 0.3830 -0.00470.0478 0.4522 0.4468 0.0054

0.008 0.492 0.4681 0.02390.0279 0.5279 0.5106 0.01730.1064 0.6064 0.5532 0.05320.1772 0.6772 0.6170 0.06020.2123 0.7123 0.6596 0.05270.2422 0.7422 0.7021 0.04010.2734 0.7734 0.7660 0.00740.3023 0.8023 0.8085 -0.00620.3264 0.8264 0.8511 -0.02470.3508 0.8508 0.8723 -0.02150.3708 0.8708 0.8936 -0.02280.3907 0.8907 0.9362 -0.04550.4082 0.9082 0.9574 -0.04920.4564 0.9564 0.9787 -0.02230.4649 0.9649 1.0000 -0.03517.7842 13.9356 14.3404 -0.4048

10.3739

NILAI MUTLAK (tanda Min di

abaikan)

Page 8: Data Liliform (2)

Kesimpulan

Hasil analisis normalitas data melalui uji Lilliefors menunjukkan L hitung < L tabel, sehingga Ho diterima. Artinya, data sampel berasal dari populasi yang berdistribusi normal.

Page 9: Data Liliform (2)

42.23SD =

10.37 SD107.61795 10.373907

Lh < Lt maka Ho diterima

1

).( S

n

YYifi 2