9. Hasil Olah Data

5
Lampiran 4. Hasil Olah data Case Processing Summary kelompok perlakuan Cases Valid Missing Total N Percent N Percent N Percen t selisih kadar glukosa darah kontrol (konsumsi nasi putih) 11 100.0% 0 .0% 11 100.0% perlakuan 1 (konsumsi kentang rebus) 11 100.0% 0 .0% 11 100.0% perlakuan 2 (konsumsi talas kukus) 11 100.0% 0 .0% 11 100.0% Descriptives kelompok perlakuan Statistic Std. Error selisi h kadar glukos a darah kontrol (konsumsi nasi putih) Mean 39.73 .992 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 37.52 Upper Bound 41.94 5% Trimmed Mean 39.47 Median 39.00 Variance 10.818 Std. Deviation 3.289 Minimum 36 Maximum 48 71

description

htytruy

Transcript of 9. Hasil Olah Data

Page 1: 9. Hasil Olah Data

Lampiran 4. Hasil Olah data

Case Processing Summary

kelompok perlakuan

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

selisih kadar glukosa

darah

kontrol (konsumsi

nasi putih)11 100.0% 0 .0% 11 100.0%

perlakuan 1

(konsumsi kentang

rebus)

11 100.0% 0 .0% 11 100.0%

perlakuan 2

(konsumsi talas

kukus)

11 100.0% 0 .0% 11 100.0%

Descriptives

kelompok perlakuan Statistic Std. Error

selisih

kadar

glukosa

darah

kontrol (konsumsi nasi putih) Mean 39.73 .992

95% Confidence Interval for

Mean

Lower Bound 37.52

Upper Bound 41.94

5% Trimmed Mean 39.47

Median 39.00

Variance 10.818

Std. Deviation 3.289

Minimum 36

Maximum 48

Range 12

Interquartile Range 4

Skewness 1.655 .661

71

Page 2: 9. Hasil Olah Data

Kurtosis 3.707 1.279

perlakuan 1 (konsumsi

kentang rebus)

Mean 32.82 .772

95% Confidence Interval for

Mean

Lower Bound 31.10

Upper Bound 34.54

5% Trimmed Mean 32.80

Median 33.00

Variance 6.564

Std. Deviation 2.562

Minimum 29

Maximum 37

Range 8

Interquartile Range 5

Skewness .115 .661

Kurtosis -.879 1.279

perlakuan 2 (konsumsi talas

kukus)

Mean 28.82 .600

95% Confidence Interval for

Mean

Lower Bound 27.48

Upper Bound 30.16

5% Trimmed Mean 28.80

Median 29.00

Variance 3.964

Std. Deviation 1.991

Minimum 26

Maximum 32

Range 6

Interquartile Range 4

Skewness .212 .661

Kurtosis -1.295 1.279

72

Page 3: 9. Hasil Olah Data

Tests of Normality

kelompok perlakuan

Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

selisih kadar

glukosa darah

kontrol (konsumsi nasi

putih).194 11 .200* .859 11 .055

perlakuan 1 (konsumsi

kentang rebus).137 11 .200* .964 11 .824

perlakuan 2 (konsumsi

talas kukus).183 11 .200* .936 11 .471

a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

Test of Homogeneity of Variances

selisih kadar glukosa darah

Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.

.357 2 30 .702

ANOVA

selisih kadar glukosa darah

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups 670.061 2 335.030 47.087 .000

Within Groups 213.455 30 7.115

Total 883.515 32

73

Page 4: 9. Hasil Olah Data

Multiple Comparisons

selisih kadar glukosa darah

LSD

(I) kelompok perlakuan

(J) kelompok

perlakuan

Mean

Difference

(I-J) Std. Error Sig.

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound Upper Bound

kontrol (konsumsi nasi putih) perlakuan 1 (konsumsi

kentang rebus)6.909* 1.137 .000 4.59 9.23

perlakuan 2 (konsumsi

talas kukus)10.909* 1.137 .000 8.59 13.23

perlakuan 1 (konsumsi

kentang rebus)

kontrol (konsumsi nasi

putih)-6.909* 1.137 .000 -9.23 -4.59

perlakuan 2 (konsumsi

talas kukus)4.000* 1.137 .001 1.68 6.32

perlakuan 2 (konsumsi talas

kukus)

kontrol (konsumsi nasi

putih)-10.909* 1.137 .000 -13.23 -8.59

perlakuan 1 (konsumsi

kentang rebus)-4.000* 1.137 .001 -6.32 -1.68

*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

74