03 slide num & mlk - persiapan akreditasi internasional abet untuk teknik informatika

1Informatika

Persiapan Akreditasi Internasional (ABET) untuk Teknik Informatika

Dr. Nur Ulfa Maulidevi & Dr. Masayu Leylia Khodra

KK- Informatika

STEI-ITB

2KK - Informatika

Outline

• Akreditasi untuk Perguruan Tinggi

• Mengapa Akreditasi ABET ?

• Proses Akreditasi ABET

• Persiapan Akreditasi di IF-ITB

3KK - Informatika

Akreditasi untuk Perguruan Tinggi

• Penilaian mutu dan efisiensi penyelenggaraan

program studi dan perguruan tinggi

(BAN-PT http://ban-pt.kemdiknas.go.id/ )

• Bukti suatu program studi memenuhi standar yang

diperlukan untuk menghasilkan lulusan yang siap

memasuki profesinya

(ABET http://abet.org/ )

• Lulusan: standar global kemampuan teknikal dan profesional

• Jaminan kualitas dan peningkatannya akan berkelanjutan

Workshop Kurikulum Teknik Informatika - ITB

http://ban-pt.kemdiknas.go.id/

http://abet.org/why-accreditation-matters/

4KK - Informatika

ABET

• Organisasi nirlaba dan non-pemerintah

yang mengakreditasi bidang sains

terapan, computing, teknik, and

teknologi

• Program pendidikan terakreditasi ABET: 3100 program di 670 universitas dari 24 negara


5KK - Informatika

Mengapa Akreditasi ABET ?

• Pengakuan internasional atas kualitas program

studi kerekayasaan / computing

• Kompetensi lulusan diakui memenuhi standar internasional

• Wujud Visi ITB dalam Renstra ITB 2010-2015

• ITB berupaya untuk memperoleh pengakuan internasional terhadap mutu kurikulum, metode pembelajaran, tenaga pengajar, serta prasarana pendukung pembelajaran


6KK - Informatika

Program Studi ITB Terakreditasi ABET

• T. Elektro, T. Kelautan, T. Kimia, T. Fisika

• Teknik Informatika ?

• Tahap persiapan akreditasi ABET


7KK - Informatika

Proses Akreditasi ABET

Sebelum Akreditasi:

Assessment Planning

Akreditasi (18 bulan):

- Permintaan Evaluasi

- Self Study Report

- Kunjungan Assesor ABET

Setelah Akreditasi:

Pelaporan Perubahan


8KK - Informatika

Assessment Planning

• 2008: Tim Akreditasi Internasional IF-ITB

• Evaluasi proses pendidikan yang sedang berjalan:

• Hasil evaluasi: sulit mengisi self study report / adanya kesenjangan antara proses pendidikan yang terjadi dengan kriteria ABET

• Merekomendasikan perbaikan agar sesuai standar internasional

• 2012: Persiapan Self Study Report (SSR) Final

• Target pendaftaran akreditasi: 2013

• Bidang akreditasi: Computer Science (Computing)

9KK - Informatika

Self Study Report

• 8 aspek evaluasi:

1. Students

2. Program educational objectives (PEO) – Kompetensi Lulusan

3. Objectives, Student Outcomes (SO), & Assessments

4. Continuous Improvement

5. Curriculum

6. Faculty

7. Facilities

8. Institutional Support

10KK - Informatika

Program Educational Objective (PEO)

1. Our graduates will have successful careers and

become productive professionals in their fields.

2. Our graduates will be able to gain admission to

and complete their graduate studies.

3. Our graduates will be able to develop

professionally through life-long learning and

have an active role in the development of new

tools, technologies and methodologies.

11KK - Informatika

A An ability to apply knowledge of computing and mathematics appropriate to the discipline

B An ability to analyze a problem, and identify and define the computing requirements appropriate to its

solution

C An ability to design, implement and evaluate a computer-based system, process, component, or program to

meet desired needs

D An ability to function effectively on teams to accomplish a common goal

E An understanding of professional, ethical, legal, security, and social issues and responsibilities

F An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences

G An ability to analyze the local and global impact of computing on individuals, organizations and society

H Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in, continuing professional development

I An ability to use current techniques, skills, and tools necessary for computing practices

J An ability to apply mathematical foundations, algorithmic principles, and computer science theory in the

modeling and design of computer-based systems in a way that demonstrates comprehension of the tradeoffs

involved in design choices

K An ability to apply design and development principles in the construction of software systems of varying

complexity

Students Outcomes

12KK - Informatika

Monitoring dan Evaluasi PEO

• PEO harus

selalu di

monitor, di

evaluasi, dan

diperbaiki jika

diperlukan

Institutional

Program

Mission

Evaluation of Program

Educational Objectives by

Undergraduate Program

Curriculum Committeee

Constituent

Meeting

Alumni

SurveyTracer

Study

Review of Program Educational

Objectives on Advisory Board Meeting

Approval of Program

Educational Objectives by

SEEI Senate

Approval by Dean of

SEEI

13KK - Informatika

Student Outcome (SO)

• Kompetensi

spesifik yang

akan dimiliki

lulusan

• Diturunkan

dari PEO

(Program

Educational

Objective)

Program Educational Objective

1 2 3

Stu

den

t O

utc

om

es

a X X X

b X X X

c X X

d X

e X

f X X

g X X

h X X

i X X

j X X

k X X

14KK - Informatika

Monitoring dan Evaluasi SO

• Seperti PEO,

SO juga

harus selalu

di monitor, di

evaluasi, dan

diperbaiki jika

diperlukan

Program

Educational

Objective

Establishment and

Revision of Student

Outcomes by

Undergraduate

Program

Curriculum

Committeee

ABET

Criteria

Tracer Study,

Constituent Meeting &

Alumni Survey

Approval of Student

Outcomes by SEEI Senate

Approval by Dean of

SEEI

15KK - Informatika

Penyusunan Kurikulum

• SO : petunjuk dalam penyusunan kurikulum

• Setiap SO akan dicapai dari matakuliah apa saja

• Berdasarkan SO yang sudah dibentuk oleh Prodi,

dibentuk kurikulum Prodi IF yang terdiri atas 4

kategori yaitu:

• Basic science and mathematics

• Computing topics

• Non-computing electives

• General education

16KK - Informatika

Kaitan antara SO dan Kategori kuliah pada Kurikulum


Course Categories

Students Learning Outcomes

a b c d e f g h i j k

Basic Science and Math x x x x

Computing Topics x x x x x x x x x x x

Non-Computing Elective x* x* x* x* x* x* x* x* x* x* x*

General Education x x x x x x

17KK - Informatika

Perbaikan Kurikulum

• Kurikulum

diubah 5 tahun

sekali

Student

Outcomes

Curriculum

and Course

Revision

Assemble

Performance

Criteria &

Metric

ACM & IEEE-Computer

Society Curriculum

Guide

Teaching &

Learning

Process

Assessment

&

Evaluation

18KK - Informatika

Bagaimana mengukur ketercapaian SO?• Alat pengukuran:

• Rubric kuliah: merepresentasikan langsung capaian siswa dalam suatu outcome untuk suatu kuliah

• Kuesioner kuliah: pengukuran tidak langsung, berdasarkan persepsi siswa yang menilai aspek pengajar kuliah, dan pemahaman mereka terhadap topik kuliah (bagian kedua yang digunakan untuk pengukuran SO)

• Exit Survey: diberikan kepada wisudawan, untuk menilai sendiri capaian mereka terhadap SO

• Masing-masing diberikan nilai 1 (E) – 5 (A)

• 5 adalah nilai terbaik

19KK - Informatika

Rencana pengukuran SO

• Pengukuran SO minimal dilakukan dalam 3 semester perkuliahan, misal Prodi IF melakukan di:• Semester II 2011/2012

• Semester I 2012/2013

• Semester II 2012/2013

• Tidak harus dilakukan pada semua kuliah, namun lebih baik jika dapat dilakukan untuk semua kuliah yang ditawarkan

• Harus ada minimal 2 semester yang memberikan kuliah yang sama, agar dapat diukur perbandingan capaian antar 2 semester tersebut mengetahui apakah terjadi continuous improvement

• Inti dari akreditasi ABET adalah terlaksananya continuous improvement

20KK - Informatika

Pengukuran SO di Semester II 2011/2012

Code Name A B C D E F G H I J K

IF2032 Object Oriented

Programming

x x

IF2036 Software

Engineering

x x

IF2050 Logic of Informatics x x x

IF3038 Internet

Programming

x x

IF3054 Artificial

Intelligence

x x

IF3099 Human Computer

Interaction

x x

IF3094 Inter Personal

Communication

x

21KK - Informatika

Pengukuran SO di Semester I 2012/2013Code Name A B C D E F G H I J K

IF2091 Discrete Structure x

IF2092 Probability & Statistics x

KU1071 Introduction to

Information Technology

A

x

IF2030 Algorithm and Data

Structure

x

IF3051 Strategy of Algorithm x x

IF3057 Information System x x x x

IF4031 Management of

Software Project

x

IF4092 Socio-Technology of

Information

x x x x

IF4091 Industrial Practice

(Internship)

x x x x x x x x

IF4096 Final Project I &

Seminar

x

IF3037 Advanced Software

Engineering

x X

22KK - Informatika

Pengukuran SO di Semester II 2012/2013Code Name A B C D E F G H I J K

IF2091 Discrete Structure x

IF2092 Probability & Statistics x

KU1071 Introduction to

Information Technology

A

x

IF2030 Algorithm and Data

Structure

x

IF3051 Strategy of Algorithm x x

IF3057 Information System x x x x

IF4031 Management of

Software Project

x

IF4092 Socio-Technology of

Information

x x x x

IF4091 Industrial Practice

(Internship)

x x x x x x x x

IF4096 Final Project I &

Seminar

x

IF3037 Advanced Software

Engineering

x X

23KK - Informatika

Contoh Rubric kuliah Logika Informatika

• Mengukur 3 SO yaitu a, c, dan i

Student outcomeHow they are covered by specific course

outcomesEvaluation

aAn ability to apply knowledge of computing

and mathematics appropriate to the discipline1

Students are able to translate a natural

language problem into propositional logic

representation

Quiz 1 No. 1

2

Students are able to translate a natural

language problem into relational logic

representation

Midterm Test No. 7a

c

An ability to design, implement, and evaluate a

computer-based system, process, component,

or program to meet desired needs

1

Students are able to design and implement

a simple program in Prolog to solve simple

problem, based on automatic theorem

proving

Final Test No. 1c

2

Students are able to evaluate an existing

Prolog program, based on the problem to

be solved

Final Test No. 4

iAn ability to use current techniques, skills, and

tools necessary for computing practice1

Students are able to prove or draw a

conclusion from existing facts/ premises

using propositional/ relational proof

Midterm Test No. 7b

2

Students are able to prove or draw a

conclusion from existing facts/ premises

using propositional/ relational resolution

Quiz 2 No. 2

24KK - Informatika

Contoh Rubric kuliah Logika Informatika (2)

Problem A B C D E

a.1 Translate the

sentences from natural

language into

propositional logic

representation

Quiz 1 No. 1All sentences are

translated correctly

able to translate some

compound sentences

and able to translate all

simple sentences

Able to translate all

sentences into simple

propositional sentences

Able to translate some

of simple sentences

and not able to translate

into compound

senteces

Can not translate all the

sentences into

propositional language

42 2 33 7 0 0

a.2 Translate the

sentences from natural

language into relational

logic representation

(FOL)

Midterm

Test No. 7a

All sentences are

translated correctly

able to translate some

compound sentences

and able to translate all

simple sentences with

correct quantifier

Able to translate all

sentences into simple

propositional sentences

but incorrect quantifier

Able to translate some

of simple sentences

and not able to translate

into compound

senteces

Can not translate all the

sentences into

propositional language

43 12 14 4 8 5

c.1

Built a prolog program to

manipulate list

Final Test

No. 1c

Program are correctly

created

The logic are correct,

but the syntax is

incorret

Case analysis is not

complete

Program are wrong

logically

Does not know how to

build the program

43 24 4 3 4 8

25KK - Informatika

Contoh Rubric kuliah Logika Informatika (3)

Problem

All sentences

are translated

correctly

able to

translate some

compound

sentences and

able to

translate all

simple

sentences

Able to

translate all

sentences into

simple

propositional

sentences

Able to

translate some

of simple

sentences and

not able to

translate into

compound

senteces

Can not

translate all the

sentences into

propositional

language

Evaluation

a.1Translate the

sentences

from natural

language into

propositional

logic

representation

Quiz 1

No. 15% 79% 17% 0% 0%

Achievements: This achievement is sufficient, since

most of the students are able to translate the natural

language correctly into simple sentence, but need to be

improved in translating into compound sentence.

Need modest improvement: More example and practice

in translating natural language sentences into

propositional logic compound sentences.

Program are

correctly

created

The logic are

correct, but the

syntax is

incorret

Case analysis

is not complete

Program are

wrong logically

Does not know

how to build

the program

Evaluation

c.1

Built a prolog

program to

manipulate list

Final Test

No. 1c56% 9% 7% 9% 19%

Achievements: Most of the students are able to build a

simple prolog program to manipulate list.

Need modest improvement: Additional tutorial for

students who have problems in build simple prolog

program is necessary. This tutorial can not be given in

class since most of the students are not having this

problem.

26KK - Informatika

Contoh hasil evaluasi di 2 semester

• Hasil evaluasi kuliah Logika Informatika di Sem II

2011/2012 untuk SO (a):

• Most of the students are able to apply their knowledge in computing and mathematics to solve problem using logical representation approach. More exercise is encouraged to be carried out in order to develop their competencies.

• Hasil evaluasi kuliah Logika Informatika di Sem II

2012/2013 untuk SO (a):

• By giving more practices to students, the achievement of this outcome is improved from last year achievement. Modest improvement is required by giving special tutorial for students who need it.

27KK - Informatika

Contoh grafik hasil Pengukuran

• Contoh untuk SO (a) yaitu An ability to apply knowledge of computing and mathematics appropriate to the discipline yang diukur dengan Exit Survey, Kuesioner Siswa, dan Rubric

• Dari grafik terlihat, hasil pengukuran pada kuliah melalui rubric, dan persepsi mahasiswa mengenai kemampuan dirinya, konsisten di daerah “substantially developed”

28KK - Informatika

Lanjutan Proses Akreditasi ABET

• Setelah Prodi melakukan assessment planning, Prodi mendaftarkan

RFE (Request for Evaluation) ke ABET

• ABET melakukan proses akreditasi selama 18 bulan:

• Review kesiapan Prodi & Melengkapi request for Approval

• Melengkapi Self Study Report

• On-site Visit oleh pihak ABET ke Prodi

• Perbaikan hasil on-site visit selama 30 hari

• Hasil keputusan & pengumuman

• Proses selanjutnya (optional) : perbaikan program, pemberitahuan ke

ABET jika Prodi melakukan perubahan yang berpengaruh pada ABET

compliances, dll

• Reevaluasi Prodi oleh ABET setidaknya 6 tahun sekali, namun jika

diperlukan bisa dilakukan reevaluasi sebelum 6 tahun berikutnya.

29KK - Informatika

Penutup

• Akreditasi “mengharuskan” Prodi untuk selalu

menjaga kualitas kurikulum, dan melakukan

perbaikan terus menerus

• Semua proses dan data harus tercatat, terukur,

dan jelas tahapan monitoring dan evaluasi nya

• Kurikulum harus selalu mengacu pada azas

kebermanfaatan untuk masyarakat

30KK - Informatika

TERIMA KASIH

03 slide num & mlk - persiapan akreditasi internasional abet untuk teknik informatika

Education

Transcript of 03 slide num & mlk - persiapan akreditasi internasional abet untuk teknik informatika